SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2024 Supreme(UK) 569

IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL
Alok Kumar Verma, J.
Manish Gupta - Applicant
Vs.
State of Uttarakhand and Another - Respondents
Anticipatory Bail Application No. 39 of 2024
Decided On : 16-01-2024

Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Appellant : Mr. Lalit Sharma, Adv.
For the State : Mr. Bhaskar Joshi, A.G.A.

IMPORTANT POINT
The court established that anticipatory bail can be granted based on the applicant's circumstances, including residency, lack of criminal history, and the nature of the allegations, while emphasizing the protection of personal liberty.

Headnote:

ANTICIPATORY BAIL - CRIMINAL PROCEDURE - The court granted anticipatory bail under Section 438 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, emphasizing the importance of personal liberty under Article 21 of the Constitution. The court considered the absence of criminal antecedents, the filing of a charge-sheet, and the applicant's permanent residency, concluding that the circumstances did not warrant the denial of bail.

Fact of the Case:

The applicant, Manish Gupta, sought anticipatory bail in connection with a case involving serious charges including rape and assault. The prosecutrix alleged that the applicant forcibly had physical relations with her when her mother was absent. The applicant contended that the dispute arose after the prosecutrix's marital status was revealed and highlighted his lack of criminal history and residency.

Finding of the Court:

The court found that personal liberty is a fundamental right and should only be restricted under compelling circumstances. The applicant's permanent residency and the absence of prior criminal records were significant factors in the decision.

Issues: Whether the applicant should be granted anticipatory bail considering the serious allegations against him and the circumstances surrounding the case.

Ratio Decidendi: The court held that anticipatory bail can be granted when the applicant demonstrates that there is no likelihood of absconding or tampering with evidence, and when personal liberty is at stake.

Result: The court granted anticipatory bail to the applicant, subject to certain conditions, including regular attendance at trial and restrictions on leaving the country.

JUDGMENT :

Alok Kumar Verma, J.

Present Application has been filed under Section 438 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 for grant of Anticipatory Bail under Sections 376, 323, 427, 504 and Section 506 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 in connection with the Case Crime No. 484 of 2021 (Criminal Case No. 1798 of 2022), registered at Police Station Vikas Nagar, District Dehradun.

2. Heard Mr. Lalit Sharma, learned counsel for the applicant (through video conferencing) and Mr. Bhaskar Joshi, learned A.G.A. for the State.

3. Opposing the Anticipatory Bail Application orally, Mr. Bhaskar Joshi, learned A.G.A. for the State, has submitted that as per the First Information Report dated 23.11.2021, the prosecutrix met the applicant three years ago. He used to come to her house. One day when the prosecutrix’s mother was not present in her house, he forcibly had physical relations with her.

4. Mr. Lalit Sharma, Advocate, contended that the prosecutrix is a 25 years old woman. The dispute between the applicant and the prosecutrix arouse only when the applicant came to know that she is a divorced woman. Applicant was granted interim relief in the Writ Petition, filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India and in the matter, filed under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973. Applicant is a permanent resident of District Dehradun, therefore, there is no possibility of his absconding. He does not have any criminal antecedents. Charge-sheet has already been filed, therefore, there is no chance of tampering with the evidence.

5. Personal liberty under Article 21 of the Constitution of India is very precious fundamental right and it should be curtailed only when it becomes imperative according to the peculiar facts and circumstances of the case.

6. In the facts and circumstances of the case, applicant- Manish Gupta is directed to be released on Anticipatory Bail, in the event of his arrest, on furnishing his personal bond of Rs. 30,000/- and two reliable sureties, each in the like amount on the following conditions:-

    (i) Applicant shall attend the Trial court regularly and he shall not seek any unnecessary adjournment;

(ii) Applicant shall not directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person, acquainted with the facts of this case;

(iii) Applicant shall not leave the country without the previous permission of the Trial Court.

7. It is clarified that if the applicant misuses or violates any of the conditions, imposed upon him, the concerned authority will be free to move the Court for cancellation of the anticipatory bail.

8. Present Anticipatory Bail Application (No. 39 of 2024) stands disposed of accordingly.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top