IN THE HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH BENCH AT INDORE
Rajendra Kumar Verma, J.
Lokesh – Appellant
Versus
State of Madhya Pradesh – Respondent
Miscellaneous Criminal Case No. 64069 of 2021
Decided On : 25-03-2022
Anticipatory Bail - Section 306 IPC - The court granted anticipatory bail to the applicant, considering the suspicious nature of the prosecution story and the applicant's innocence as claimed by the counsel. The applicant was directed to furnish a personal bond and cooperate with the investigation.
Fact of the Case:
The applicant filed for anticipatory bail under Section 438 of the Code of Criminal Procedure in connection with a case registered for the offence under Section 306 of IPC, alleging that the applicant's harassment led to his wife's suicide.
Finding of the Court:
The court, considering the facts and circumstances, granted anticipatory bail to the applicant, directing him to furnish a personal bond and cooperate with the investigation.
Issues: The main issue was the applicant's apprehension of arrest in connection with the alleged offence under Section 306 of IPC and the claim of innocence by the applicant's counsel.
Ratio Decidendi: The court granted anticipatory bail based on the suspicious nature of the prosecution story and the claim of innocence by the applicant's counsel.
Final Decision: The court allowed the first application for bail under Section 438 of the Cr.P.C. and directed the applicant to be released on anticipatory bail upon furnishing a personal bond and cooperating with the investigation.
JUDGMENT
Rajendra Kumar Verma, J. - This is the first application filed by the applicant under Section 438 of the Code of Criminal Procedure for grant of anticipatory bail.
T h e applicant is apprehending his arrest in connection with Crime No.506/2021 registered at Police Station Maingaon District Khargone for the offences punishable under Section 306 of IPC.
as per prosecution story, the allegation against the applicant is that due to the harassment and disputed approach of the applicant, the wife of the applicant committed suicide. accordingly, the applicant has been implicated in the case.
Learned counsel for the applicant submits that the applicant is innocent and has been falsely implicated in the aforesaid crime. The whole prosecution story is suspicious as the applicant himself has constructed the house over the said plot and for the construction he had obtained a loan of Rs.1,00,000/- from M.P.Gramin Kshetriya Bank and a subsidy of Rs.2,50,000/- was also deposited in his account which was utilized by him in constructing house over the said plot. It is further submitted that the wife of the applicant was in illicit relationship with some other person and she used to chat with that person on his mobile number 8982825722 and the copies of the chat are available on record which indicates that she was in illicit relationship. at the time of incident the applicant was not present on the spot. It is further submitted that the mother of the deceased was present at the time of incident in the house and after 14 days of the incident, the mother of the deceased has levelled allegations against the applicant. On these grounds, the applicant may be enlarged on anticipatory bail.
Learned Government advocate on the other hand has vehemently opposed the bail application.
However, keeping in view the facts and circumstances of the case, in the opinion of this Court, the applicant deserves to be released on bail. Consequently, this first application for bail under Section 438 of the Cr.P.C. filed on behalf of the applicant is allowed.
It is directed that in the event of his arrest, the applicant be released on anticipatory bail on his furnishing a personal bond in the sum of Rs.50,000/-(Rupees Fifty Thousand Only) with a solvent surety in the same amount to the satisfaction of the arresting Officer and for complying with the conditions enumerated in sub-Section (2) of Section 438 of the Cr.P.C.
The applicant shall appear before the concerned Investigating Officer as and when required and shall cooperate in the investigation of the matter.
C.C. as per rules.
Grant of anticipatory bail based on the suspicious nature of the prosecution story and the claim of innocence by the applicant's counsel.
Abatement of suicide - since the applicant was engaged to the deceased Jamuna Yadav and she was not married and was even pregnant on the date of committing suicide, therefore, offence has been regist....
The court established that anticipatory bail can be granted based on the applicant's circumstances, including residency, lack of criminal history, and the nature of the allegations, while emphasizing....
The court may grant anticipatory bail based on the nature of allegations and the circumstances of the case, including the status of co-accused.
applicant is not entitled for anticipatory bail on the ground that applicant was not only declared proclaimed offender under Section 82 Cr.P.C. but proclamation of attachment of property was also iss....
The court emphasized the importance of specific instances and evidence in allegations of harassment and referred to the settled law for the charge under Section 306 of the IPC.
Anticipatory bail can be granted if there are no specific allegations against the applicant, ensuring the right to a fair trial and evidentiary support for accusations.
Grant of anticipatory bail - matter is being settled between the husband, wife and her in-laws, as such, the present applicants be granted the privilege of anticipatory bail.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.