SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(UK) 28

HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND
SHAJAAD ALI – Appellant
Versus
DILSHAAD – Respondent


JUDGMENT :

Rakesh Thapliyal, J.

1. On 29.10.2025, record of Civil Revision No. 38 of 2024 was summoned and the matter was heard at length and record of O.S. No. 341 of 1989, O.S. No. 211 of 1990 and O.S. No. 123 of 2012 were summoned.

2. Mr. Siddhartha Singh, learned counsel for the respondent placed before this Court the certified copies of certain documents of O.S. NO. 211 of 1990, the copy of which, in advance, was supplied to Mr. Arvind Vashistha, learned Senior Advocate as well as to Mr. Aditya Pratap Singh, learned counsel, who appears for the respondent in Civil Revision No. 38 of 2024. The first document is an application under Order 22 Rule 4 read with Section 9 and 151 of CPC moved by the plaintiffs of Suit on 16.01.2006, giving reference of three persons showing them to be legal heirs of Late Brijmohan Lal Gupta and Ramal Rani in which notices were issued to the so called legal heir of Late Brijmohan Lal Gupta and thereafter an affidavit was filed by one of the so called legal heir, namely, Anil Kumar by giving pedigree of family of “Late Rehtulal” who have two sons Basheshwardayal and Kriparam; Basheshwardayal have two sons, namely, Brijmohal Lal Gupta and Seva Ram and da

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top