SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(UK) 36

HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND
LAXMAN SINGH SAMANT – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF UTTARAKHAND – Respondent


Table of Content
1. eligibility criteria for ctet post-2011 (Para 1 , 2 , 3)
2. court's recognition of prior rulings on eligibility (Para 4)
3. cbse's stance on verification obligations (Para 5 , 6)
4. private respondents' defense on eligibility (Para 7)
5. two issues formulated for further consideration (Para 8)
6. next steps in the judicial process (Para 9 , 10)

JUDGMENT :

Rakesh Thapliyal, J.

1. Today in furtherance of previous arguments, Mr. Negi, learned Senior Counsel for the petitioners raised one more vital issue which, in fact, goes to the root of the matter. He submits that all the private respondents who have been given appointment in the Primary Institutions obtained CTET certificate after 2011, though, after 2011 no relaxation was granted to B.Ed. qualified candidate to appear in the CTET examination. In reference to this, Mr. Negi learned counsel bring to the notice of this Court the Notification of the NCTE dated 23.08.2010. Clause (1) of this Notification relates to the minimum qualification and clause (3) pertains to training, which are being reproduced herein as under:-

1. Minimum Qualification: (i)

(a) Senior Secondary or its equivalent with as least 50% marks and 2 year Di

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top