SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(UK) 40

HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND
DR ANCHAL BHATNAGAR – Appellant
Versus
H N B UTTARAKHAND MEDICAL EDUCATION UNIVERSITY – Respondent


Table of Content
1. nature of petitions for admission to mds (Para 1 , 2 , 3)
2. deadline for admissions and its implications (Para 4 , 5)
3. timeliness and requirements for neet pg examination (Para 6 , 7 , 8)
4. rejection of petitioners' admission request (Para 9 , 10)

JUDGMENT :

Subhash Upadhyay, J.

1. As both the Writ Petitions involve similar question of facts and law hence, the same are being decided by the common Judgment.

2. The petitioners have filed the present Writ Petitions with the following identical prayers:

(a) Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus thereby directing the respondents, particularly, respondent nos. 1, 2 & 4 to give admission to the petitioner against the vacant medical seat for Master of Dental Surgery (MDS) in Periodontolgoy Department in Seema Dental College & Hospital (respondent no.4) in accordance to the result of the Stray Round for Uttarakhand State Centralized Counseling conducted by respondent no.2 for academic Sessions 20025-26; or alternately,

(b) Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of madams thereby directing the respondents, particularly, respondent no. 1 to 3 to conduct one more special/stray round of Uttarakhand Sta

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top