HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND
ASAD KHAN – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF UTTARAKHAND – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
Pankaj Purohit, J.
1. The present writ petition has been filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India read with Section 528 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, seeking issuance of writ of mandamus and certiorari for quashing the impugned Look Out Circular (“LOC”) issued by respondent no. 3 against the petitioner.
2. Brief facts of the case are that the present petition arises from two FIRs lodged at Police Station Buggawala, District Haridwar. The first FIR bearing No.41 of 2022 dated 10.05.2022 was registered under Sections 420, 504, and 506 of the IPC at the instance of one Mr. Praneet Kohli, alleging that the petitioner sold certain land situated in Badiwala, Haridwar, to the complainant’s son, Mr. Mudit Kohli, through forged and fabricated documents. Subsequently, a second FIR, being the present FIR No.49 of 2022 dated 15.06.2022, was registered under Sections 420, 467, 468, and 471 of the IPC, on similar allegations regarding the same parcel of land. It was alleged that the petitioner forged the signatures of the complainant, Mr. Zulfan, and his brother, Shahnawaz, to create false documents and used the same to obtain approval from the District Mag
Look Out Circulars must be issued with careful consideration of individual rights versus public interest, particularly in ongoing criminal investigations.
The main legal point established in the judgment is that the issuance of a Look Out Circular should be based on exceptional circumstances and cogent reasons, and should not be resorted to in a routin....
The issuance of Look Out Circulars must adhere to strict procedural guidelines and cannot infringe on personal liberty without compelling reasons.
The issuance of a Look-Out Circular must be justified; arbitrary LOCs infringe personal liberty under Article 21.
The judgment establishes the exceptional circumstances under which Look Out Circulars (LOC) can be issued, emphasizing the need for credible material and reasons to support the issuance of an LOC.
The issuance and continuation of a Look-Out Circular must be justified by compelling reasons, specifically regarding flight risk or evading justice; lack of fresh evidence can render it arbitrary.
Look Out Circulars must adhere strictly to legal frameworks and cannot deny fundamental rights without justifiable grounds.
The issuance of Lookout Circulars must be justified and cannot infringe upon the fundamental right to travel without sufficient grounds.
The issuance of Look Out Circular against a UK citizen was unconstitutional, infringing on the right to travel without due cause, lacking sufficient grounds under the governing Office Memorandum.
The issuance of Look Out Circulars requires adherence to proper procedure and can only be justified in serious cases where the accused evades arrest, safeguarding personal liberty.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.