Back
HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND
State Of Uttarakhand AND ANOTHER – Appellant
Versus
Smt Meenakshi Chaudhary – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. defendants' appeal against prior judgment. (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. discussion on property rights under hindu succession act. (Para 3 , 4 , 5 , 6) |
| 3. court's view on the legitimacy of the will and sale deed. (Para 7 , 8 , 15 , 16 , 17) |
| 4. defendants contesting the legitimacy of documents. (Para 9 , 10 , 11 , 12) |
| 5. issues raised regarding argument validity concerning evidence. (Para 18 , 19 , 20 , 21 , 22) |
| 6. court finds no evidence against validity of registered documents. (Para 24 , 25 , 26 , 27) |
| 7. court's ruling against escheat property claims. (Para 28 , 29) |
| 8. arguments on appellate court's considerations. (Para 30 , 31 , 32) |
| 9. substantial questions regarding escheat and will execution. (Para 36 , 37) |
| 10. final court ruling dismissing the second appeal. (Para 48 , 49) |
JUDGMENT :
Sharad Kumar Sharma, J.
1. This is defendants’ Second Appeal, wherein the defendants have questioned the propriety of the judgement rendered by Civil Judge, (Senior Division), Dehradun in Original Suit No. 23 of 2012, Meenakshi Chaudhary v. State of Uttarakhand and another , which was decreed in favour of the plaintiff/respondent on 30th March 2013. The said judgement was put to challenge in a Civil Ap
The court held that property claimed under a valid registered Will and sale deed cannot be declared escheat if a legal heir exists, emphasizing the validity of registered documents.
The central legal point established in the judgment is the mandatory requirement of proving the execution of a Will through an attesting witness as per Section 68 of the Indian Evidence Act, 1872, an....
The court reaffirmed the validity of judicial decisions and the presumption of regularity in judicial acts, underlining that a decree, once established, remains binding unless proven fraudulent by su....
The execution and validity of a Will require strict adherence to statutory provisions, including proper attestation, which was not proven in this case, rendering the claimed interests void.
Registered attested documents like settlement deeds require proof of execution under S.68/69 Evidence Act; registration presumes no validity when challenged.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
