SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1959 Supreme(MP) 105

T.C.SHRIVASTAVA, P.K.TARE
IFTIKHAR AHMED SON OF DOST MOHAMMAD – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
B.V.SHUKLA, R.S.DABIR, S.B.SEN, V.S.DABIR

SHRIVASTAVA, J.

( 1 ) THIS petition under Article 226 of the Constitution has been filed by the petitioner Iftikhar Ahmed for quashing notifications under Sections 4 and 6 of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894 (hereinafter referred to as the Act ). The petitioner also seeks to quash the declaration issued under Section 9 of the Act and prays for a writ restraining the Slate Government from taking any action on those notifications and the declaration.

( 2 ) THE petitioner is the lessee of three survey numbers totalling to 6. 93 acres in the City of. Bhopal. The lease was taken by him from respondent No. 3 (Municipal Board, Bhopal ). At the instance of respondent No. 2, the State Government (respondent No. 1) issued Notifications Nos. 768-19130-VII-N and 76-19130-VII-N respectively under Sections 4 and 6 of the Act. The first is dated 23-12-1958 and was published in the Madhya Pradesh Gazette on 2-11959. The second is dated 3-1-1959 and was published in the Gazette on 9-1-1959. In the first notification, it was also stated that the lands were urgently required and so, in exercise of the powers under Section 17 (4) of the Act, it was declared that the provisions of Section 5-A shall not a



















Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top