High Court Of Madhya Pradesh
P. V. Dixit, C. J. and K. L. Pandey, J.
RAMCHANDRA VISHNU - Appellant
Versus
STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH - Respondents
Misc. Petn. 293 Of 1960
Decided On : 12/19/1960
MEDICAL ADMISSION - SELECTION CRITERIA - EQUALITY BEFORE THE LAW - ARTICLE 14 - EXECUTIVE INSTRUCTIONS - ARTICLE 13 - MEDICAL COLLEGES IN MADHYA PRADESH RULES FOR ADMISSION, 1960 - VALIDITY - RESERVATION OF SEATS - ARTICLE 15(3) AND 29(2) - INTERPRETATION.
Fact of the Case:
Petitioner challenged the admission process for medical colleges in Madhya Pradesh, alleging that the selection criteria were arbitrary and discriminatory, violating his right to equality before the law under Article 14 of the Constitution. He argued that the Medical Colleges in Madhya Pradesh Rules for Admission, 1960, which provided for reservation of seats for certain categories, were merely executive instructions without statutory basis and did not have the force of law.
Finding of the Court:
The court held that the Medical Colleges in Madhya Pradesh Rules for Admission, 1960, were merely executive or administrative instructions and did not attract the principle of equality before the law embodied in Article 14. The court found that the petitioner was not denied admission on any ground mentioned in Article 29(2) or Article 16(1) of the Constitution.
Issues: 1. Whether the Medical Colleges in Madhya Pradesh Rules for Admission, 1960, were law within the meaning of Article 13 of the Constitution. 2. Whether the petitioner was denied admission on any ground mentioned in Article 29(2) or Article 16(1) of the Constitution.
Ratio Decidendi: 1. The court held that the Medical Colleges in Madhya Pradesh Rules for Admission, 1960, were merely executive or administrative instructions and did not have the force of law. Therefore, they did not attract the principle of equality before the law embodied in Article 14. 2. The court found that the petitioner was not denied admission on any ground mentioned in Article 29(2) or Article 16(1) of the Constitution.
Final Decision: The petition was dismissed, and the petitioner was ordered to bear his own costs and pay the costs of the respondents.
( 1 ) THIS in a petition under Arts, 226 and 227 of the Constitution for a writ of mandamus or any other suitable writ or order directing the State Government (respondent 1) and the Principal, Medical College, Indore (respondent 2), to admit the petitioner to one of the Medical Colleges in the State.
( 2 ) IN this State, there are four Government Medical Colleges providing for admission of 330 candidates in the 1st year class. In the current year, the State Government constituted a Selection Committee of the Principals of the four colleges with the Principal, Medical College, Indore as Chairman, to recommend the names of candidates for admission to the Medical Colleges in accordance with "medical Collages in Madhya Pradesh Rules for Admission, 1960". These Rules provide inter alia as follows:
"8. Selection of candidates from amongst those who have applied for admission, will be made on merit as disclosed by the marks obtained at the Inter Science Examination provided that candidates have passed their Inter Science Examination securing at least 45 per cent marks as prescribed by the Indian Medical Council. Candidates who have passed the First Year of the Three Year B. Sc. Degree Course (Medical Group), should also have obtained a minimum of 45 per cent marks, to be eligible for admission. In the case of candidates who have passed their B. Sc. Examination in the first or second division, the requirement of securing 45 per cent marks in the qualifying examination of I. Sc. (Medical Group), may be relaxed. '' "9. As between two Candidates, who have secured equal marks, preference will be given to that candidate who, while in College and before passing the Inter Science Examination, served for a whole academic year in the N. C. C. provided the student mentions full particulars of the period of such Service in his application and produces certificates in support of the same, from the head of the organisation along with his application for admission. If the period of service rendered in the above organisation is not clearly mentioned, no credit will be given. Credit will also be given for being in the College team for Hockey, Football, Volley-ball, Cricket, Tennis, Badminton, Swimming or Hu-tutu, taking part in the University Inter College Tournaments, during the student's College career before passing the I. Sc. Examination. " "10. 15 per cent seats will be reserved for woman Candidates and 3 per cent for sons and dauters of bona fide political sufferers, provided that the candidates concerned have obtained at least 45 per Cent marks in the Inter Science Examination. Additional qualifications as mentioned in clause 9 will be taken into consideration while making selection from among the candidates for reserved seats of each category. Note.-- The term 'political sufferer' shall be in terpreted in the light of the Madhya Pradesh Freedom Fighters Pension Rules, 1959. " "11. 15 per cent seats will also be reserved each for Scheduled Caste and Scheduled Tribe Candidates in whose case, the requirement of minimum 45 per cent marks will be relaxed as per recommendations of the Indian Medical Council, provided they have passed their Inter Science Examination in Medical Group. "
"12. If the required number of candidates, possessing the minimum qualifications as laid down above are not forthcoming for any category of reserved seats, the unfilled seats shall be treated as general and shall be open to all candidates satisfying the requisite standard as in clause 8. " "17. Government reserve to themselves the right to admit any student to any of the Medical Colleges in relaxation of the Rules in special circumstances. "
There were 1637 candidates, including the petitioner and the respondents 3 and4, who sought admission, to the four Medical Colleges. The Selection Committee recommended the names of 318 candidates for as many seats and the State Government finally selected 330 candidates to fill up all the seats. The petitioner, who passed
Champakam Dorairajan v. State of Madras
State of Bombay v. Bombay Education Society, 1955-1 SCR 568
C.S.S. Motor Service v. Madras State
K. Ganganna v. Principal, Andhra Medical College
Basheshar Nath v. Commr. of Income Tax, Delhi and Rajasthan
Nagendra Nath Bora v. Commissioner of Hills Division, 1958 SCR 1240
REFERRED TO : University of Madras v. Shanta Bai
State of Madras v. Smt. Champakam Dorairajan
Joshi v. State of Madhya Bharat
Sudarsan v. State of Andhra Pradesh
Prescott v. Birmingham Corporation
Sadasiva Iyer v. State of Kerala
Ram Krishna Dalmia v. Justice Tendolkar
Abdulla Rowther v. State Transport Appellate Tribunal, Madras
AI
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.