SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1968 Supreme(MP) 69

P.V.DIXIT, R.J.BHAVE
KUMARI RAMLALI – Appellant
Versus
MST. BHAGUNTI BAI – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
G.P.SINGH, R.S.DABIR, S.AWASTHI, V.R.RAO

DIXIT, C. J.

( 1 ) THIS is a Letters Patent appeal from a decision of Pandey J. whereby the learned single Judge, setting aside the judgments of the original Court and the first appellate Court, dismissed the plaintiff-appellant Ramlali's suit for partition and separate possession of certain agricultural plots.

( 2 ) THE material facts are that one Ramnath died in February 1954 leaving two widows, one Mst. Bilasabai and another Mst. Bhaguntibai, and two daughters, the appellant Kumari Ramlali and Kumari Keshbai born of Mst Bilasabai. At the time of his death Ramnath held some plots situated in villages Deori and Tigwan on bhumiswami and Bhumidhati tenure. After his death his two widows jointly inherited the plots. Mst. Bilasabai died on 19th March 1957. Thereafter disputes started between Mst. Bhaguntibai and the two daughters of Mst. Bilasabai about the possession of the plots. Ultimately, in proceedings under Section 145 of the code of Criminal Procedure an order was made in favour of Bhaguntibai. On 9th april 1958 Bhaguntibai sold one of the plots, namely khasra No. 29th having an area of 13. 47 acres of village Tigwan to the respondents nos. 2 to 5.

( 3 ) RAMLALI and her sister














Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top