SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1975 Supreme(MP) 142

G.L.OZA, P.D.MULYE
SHERSINGH – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF M. P. – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
A.M.MATHUR, G.S.SOLANKI

OZA, J.

( 1 ) THIS is a petition filed by the petitioner under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for a direction in the nature of habeas corpus challenging his detention by the respondents under the provisions contained in the Maintenance of internal Security Act.

( 2 ) ACCORDING to the petitioner, he was detained by orders of the District magistrate, Indore, on 2-7-1975 and a declaration as contemplated under the amended Act was issued on 2-7-1975.

( 3 ) THE respondents in their reply have raised certain preliminary objections, At the hearing learned Deputy Government Advocate only argued about the preliminary objections. The main objections raised by the respondents at the time of hearing are :

(1) That in view of the proclamation of emergency by the President on 25th June, 1975 and in view of the subsequent order of the president under Article 359 of the Constitution dated 27th June, 1975, the rights guaranteed to the petitioner under Articles 14, 21, 22 and 19 of the Constitution are suspended; and because of the order of president dated 27th June, 1975, their right to move the Court also has been suspended, therefore, these petitions cannot be entertained. (2) That the M































Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top