J.P.BAJPAI, SHIV DAYAL, G.P.SINGH, K.K.DUBE, M.L.MALIK
BRIJ GOPAL DENGA – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH – Respondent
( 1 ) IN this petition under Article 226 of the Constitution, one of the points raised is that Section 19 (c) (2) of the Madhya Pradesh Cooperative Societies Act, 1960, is ultra vires for two reasons: First, that it offends Article 19 (1) (c) of the constitution; and secondly, that it suffers from excessive delegation. When the petition came up for admission before a Division Bench (K. K. Dubey and R. K. Tankha, JJ.), the learned Judges referred the petition to a Bench of five Judges. It was also impliedly indicated that the Bench of five Judges would first consider the question whether, when in a petition the constitutional validity of a State law is raised, the petition can be placed before a Bench of two Judges for purposes of admission in view of Article 228-A of the Constitution. It is on this question that we have heard arguments and it is this question which. I proceed to decide by this order.
( 2 ) UNDER the rules of the High Court made in exercise of the powers conferred by Article 225 of the Constitution and Clause 27 of the Letters Patent, a petition under Article 226 is laid before a Division Bench for motion hearing. At the time of motion hearing, the C
Mathura Prasad v. Commr.of Income-tax
Commr.of Income-tax, Ernakulam v. Managing Trustee, Jalkhabai Trust
Chandra Mohan v. State of U.P.
Rajeswar Prasad v. State of W.B.
Improvement of Calcutta v. C.S.Mallick
Commr.for Special Purposes of Income Tax v. Pemsel
Hansraj Gupta v. Dehra Dun Mussorie Electric Tramway Co.Ltd.
State of Rajasthan v. Leela Jain
Martin Burn Co.Ltd.v. Calcutta Corporation
State of M.P.v. Vishnu Prasad Sharma
Jaswant Sugar Mills Ltd., Meerut v. Laxmichand
Shriram Ramnarayan v. State of Bombay
New Savan Sugar and Gur Refining Co.Ltd.v. Commr.of Income Tax, Calcutta
R.G.Jacob v. Republic of India
Ramanjaya Singh v. Baijnath Singh
REFERRED TO : Divisional Personnel Officer, Southern Rly.v. T.R.Challapan
Cox and Kings (Agents Ltd.) v. Their Workmen
S.T.Commr., U.P.v. Parson Tools and Plants, Kanpur
Commr.of Agricultural Tax v. Keshab Chandra
Bengal Immunity Co.v. State of Bihar
Mysore State Electricity Board v. Bangalore Woollen Cotton and Silk Mills
Commr.of Income-tax, West Bengal v. Vegetable Product Ltd.
The State of U.P.v. Ram Chandra Trivedi
Commr.of Income-tax v. Chander Bhan Harbhajan
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.