H.G.MISHRA, SHIV DAYAL, K.K.DUBE, R.K.TANKHA, M.L.MALIK, J.P.BAJPAI, NEVASKAR
SHARADCHAND – Appellant
Versus
VISHNUPANT – Respondent
( 1 ) WHEN this second appeal was placed before a learned single Judge for admission, he passed the following order:-" the appeal is admitted for hearing on the following questions:-
(1) (a) There being non-compliance with Section 13 (1) of the M. P. Accommodation Control Act, 1961, in the trial court as well as in the first appellate Court, that first appeal also being by the plaintiff-landlord, was Section 13 (6) of the Act attracted in both the Courts below? (b) For the same reason, was the plaintiff entitled to a decree on the ground contained in Clause (a) of Sub-section (1) of Section 12 of the Act?
( 2 ) IS the Full Bench decision in S. S. Harishchandra Jain v. Indersingh bedi, 1977 MP LJ 417 : (AIR 1977 Madh Pra 199) no longer good law in view of the Supreme Court decision in Radha Kishan Sao v. Gopal modi, AIR 1977 SC 1217. Issue notice to the other side for a date to be fixed in the office. B. P. F. within a week. The aforesaid question No. 2, arising for decision in the appeal, has naturally to be decided by a larger Bench in view of the fact that the correctness of the Full Bench decision in S. S. Harishchandra Jain v. Indarsingh Bedi, (AIR 1977 Madh B 1
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.