SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1994 Supreme(MP) 157

M.W.DEO, V.D.GYANI
UMRAO SINGH CHOUDHARY – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF M. P. – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
A.M.MATHUR, G.M.CHAPHEKAR, P.Mathur

GYANI, J.

( 1 ) JUDICIAL review of State action by way of certiorari has been invoked by none else than the Vice-Chancellor of Devi Ahilya Vishwavidhalaya, Indore. This Court is faced with a dispute in which academic administrative law, delegated legislation involving Constitutional law, natural justice all come together on a high level of legal principles, veering round the "autonomy of a University" established under the M. P. Vishwa Vidyalaya Adhiniyam 1973 (for short 'adhiniyam' ).

( 2 ) A fax message Anx. P2 from the State Capital, has prompted the petitioner to rush to this Court for seeking relief-including interim one which was granted by order 22-194 as it was contended before us that no notification as contemplated by S. 52 of the Adhiniyam was issued by the State Govt. and published in the Govt. Gazzette. ( 3 ) THE State action was dubbed and denounced as an act of procedural impropriety, violative of elementary rules of natural justice. The challenge undoubtedly was not frivolous. Even if a few including the petitioner, might have thought it to be well founded and fewer still might have been resolute enough to defy, at any rate, attempt to defy the interim orders passed





















Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top