SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2003 Supreme(MP) 1230

K.K.LAHOTI
Parmeshwardin Patel – Appellant
Versus
Snehlata – Respondent


ORDER

1. The applicant has filed this application under section 482, CrPC for rehearing of the revision petition on the ground that on 18.11.2002, the case was listed before another Bench, but on the same day it was transferred to another Bench for hearing, this fact could not come to the notice of the applicant's counsel so the counsel could not appear before another Bench where the matter was relisted for hearing. The case was heard in the absence of the counsel for the applicant and the revision was dismissed.

2. The learned counsel for the applicant, himself was counsel in the aforesaid case. This fact is supported by an affidavit of Shri J.L. Soni, counsel, who has supported the contents of the application in which it is specifically mentioned that the fact of transfer of the case from one Bench to another Bench could not come to the notice of the counsel.

3. On notice of this application respondent appeared and contended that the rehearing of the case will amount to review of the previous order which is not permissible under the law. The order passed by this Court cannot be reviewed under section 482 CrPC. Both the counsel have relied on Apex Court judgment in Hari Singh Man v.














Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top