SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1988 Supreme(MP) 267

GULAB C.GUPTA, S.AWASTHY
NARAYANSINGH – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
A.P.SHUKLA, Jayshree Mitra,

JUDGMENT :

( 1. ) THE petitioners in this application under section 482, criminal Procedure Code complain of denial of hearing by this Court on sentence imposed upon them in Criminal Appeal No. 328 of 1984 (State vs. Halkesingh and 3 others), decided on 20th September, 1988 wherein this Court had convicted them, for the first time of offence punishable under Section 324/34, Indian Penal code and sentenced them to rigorous imprisonment for two years each. They contend that if this Court had heard them before deciding upon the sentence, they might not have been ordered to go back to jail after such a long lapse of time. The petitioners were charged for offence punishable under section 302/34, Indian penal Code but were acquitted by the Addl. Sessions Judge, Gadarwara in sessions Trial No. 34 of 1982, decided on 29-11-1983. The appeal decided by this court was the appeal against their acquittl wherein this Court written the verdict "guilty" against the petitioners and sentenced them, as aforesaid. There is no dispute that the petitioners were not heard on sentence after this Court held them guilty, as aforesaid. It is, therefore, a case where the petitioners were, for the first time co










Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top