T.N.SINGH, S.K.DUBEY
Sugreev Singh – Appellant
Versus
State of M. P. – Respondent
Dr. T.N. Singh, J.--1. Both petitioners are convicted under section 7, the Madhya Pradesh Rajya Sadak Parivahan Seva (Bina Tikat Yatra Ki Rok) Adhiniyam, 1974, for short, the 'Act' by Special Motor Vehicles Magistrate, Gwalior. The sentence imposed in one case is fine of Rs. 50/-, in default simple imprisonment for five days; and in the other case, the fine is Rs. 100/-, in default, simple imprisonment for seven days. Having preferred revisions unsuccessfully, they are now assailing their convictions and sentences in this Court, separately, under section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, for short, the 'Cr.P.C.' or the 'Code'.
2. During the course of analogous hearing of the two petitions it was found necessary by one of us (S.K. Dubey, J.) to refer to larger bench the question agitated before him on the basis of a decision of a learned Single Judge of this Court in Hiralal Gopilal Rathore's case (1988 CrLJ 457). In his view, the decision required reconsideration because a Division Bench of this Court in the case of Avadh Bihari Diwan v. MPSRTC and others, M.P. No. 88/87, decided on 20.1.1987, had dealt with the same controversy in a different manner and that decision was
1. Hiralal Gopilal Rathores case = (1988 CrLJ 457)
3. MPSRTC v. Jaiprakash = (1991 MPLJ 439)
4. Nandini Satpathy = (AIR 1978 SC 1025)
5. Poolpandi v. Superintendent, Central Excise
6. M.H. Hoskots case = (AIR 1978 SC 1548)
7. Ranjan Dwivedi = (AIR 1983 SC 624)
8. Hussainara Khatoons case = (AIR 1979 SC 1369)
9. Pratap Chandras case = (1983 CrLJ 453)
10. Phusu Koiri = (1986 CrLJ 1057)
11. K.N. Sarkar = (1968 CrLJ 121)
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.