SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2010 Supreme(MP) 540

PRAKASH SHRIVASTAVA
Ranchhod – Appellant
Versus
Hukumji – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
A.K. Jain for appellants
D.S. Kale for respondent No.1.

JUDGMENT

1. This second appeal under section 100 of Civil Procedure Code has been filed against the judgment dated 14th November, 2007, passed by the Court of First Additional Distt. Judge, West Nimar, Mandleshwar, in Regular First Appeal No. 20-Al05, dismissing the appeal and affrrming the judgments of the trial Court.

2. Brief facts are that the appellants had filed suit for declaration in respect of agricultural land, Survey No. 355 area 5.66 acres. The respondent No. 1-Hukumji had, filed counter claim in the suit, which was decided by the judgment dated 16.3.2002, holding the respondent No.1 entitled for possession of suit land and Mesne profit of Rs. 2000/-. The first appeal by the appellants was rejected on 26.4.2003 and the Second Appeal was dismissed on 14.11.2003. The respondent No.1 applied for execution of the decree in which the appellants filed objection under Order 41, Rule 97 of the Civil Procedure Code. The Executing Court by order dated 1.4.2005 while rejecting the objection held that the judgment -debtor had, no right to file the objection and that during the pendency of suit he had not raised objection relating to identity of the property. The First Appeal preferre




























Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top