SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2002 Supreme(MP) 909

A.K.SHRIVASTAVA
Mangleshwar Singh – Appellant
Versus
State of M. P. – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
Satish Chaturvedi, Wakil Khan,

Judgment

( 1. ) APPLICANT Dr. Mangleshwar Singh is aggrieved by the order dated 3-10-96 passed by IIIrd Additional Sessions Judge, Rewa, in S. T. No. 79/95, whereby he has been charged for the offence punishable under Section 306, IPC.

( 2. ) THE facts shorn of unnecessary details lie in a narrow compass. In brief the case of. the prosecution is that on 26-2-95 at the house of Raghunath Singh arrangement of marriage of his son was going on, Raghunath Singh found that the currency notes of Rs. 800/- were missing from the pocket of his coat, he inquired from his brother applicant-Dr. Mangleshwar Singh who raised suspicion upon deceased Hiralal, who pleaded ignorance. Deceased Hiralal was serving in the house of Raghunath. Further the case of prosecution is that applicant admonished Hiralal and threatened him by saying that a report shall be lodged in police regarding theft committed by him, thereafter Hiralal went to the house of his sister Kalui and uncle Ram Ganesh and brought them to the house of Raghunath and in presence of these persons returned Rs. 800/-to Raghunath. In the meantime a dehati nalishi under Section 380 was lodged by Raghunath. It is also stated that the applicant c



















Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top