SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2009 Supreme(MP) 109

ARUN MISHRA, SUSHMA SHRIVASTAVA
WAKF IMAMBARA IMLIPURA – Appellant
Versus
KHURSHEEDA BI – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
Imtiaz Hussain, VIVEK RUSIA,

Judgment

( 1. ) IN the writ petitions common question is involved with respect to interpretation of provision of Section 85 of the wakf Act, 1995 whether the suit filed by the wakf for ejectment of the tenant is maintainable before the Civil Court or such a dispute is to be adjudicated by Wakf Tribunal under the Wakf Act, 1995.

( 2. ) IT is not in dispute that plaintiff in each of the case is a Wakf and suit has been filed for ejectment of tenant from Wakf property.

( 3. ) IN WP No. 8313/06 initially Civil Suit n. 30-A/2004 was filed on 13-2-2003 which was dismissed by the Civil Court on the ground that it had no jurisdiction to try the suit. It was triable by Wakf Tribunal, Bhopal under the provision of Wakf Act, 1995. Plaintiff filed civil appeal against the decision rendered. The appeal was decided on 6-10-2005 by the II Addl. Sessions Judge, East Nimar (Khandwa) in which plaint was ordered to be returned for presentation before the Wakf tribunal. Judgment (P/2) was delivered. Accordingly the Civil Judge returned the plaint on 22-11 -2005 for presentation before the wakf Tribunal, Bhopal. However, the tribunal has held vide order (P/3) dated 7-3-2006 that jurisdiction lie with th




























Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top