IN THE HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH
C.P. Sen and Y.B. Suryavanshi, JJ.
Kailash Joshi
Vs.
State of M.P. and Others
M.P. No. 3909 of 1987 (J.)
Decided On: 20.01.1989
(2) Constitution of India-Art. 226-extraordinary Powers of the High Court -as wide as amplitude of language used indicates-may affect even private individual. AIR 1976 SC 425 followed. [Para 13]
(3) Lottery (Niyantran Tatba Kar) Adhiniyam, 1973 (M.P.)-Ss. 5 and 6-lottery not organised for entertainment -cannot be a private lottery. [Para 15]
(4) Lottery (Niyantran Tatba Kar) Adhiniyam, 1973 (M.P.)-Ss. 6, 7 and 30 (b)-licence applied for and granted by Collector on recommendation of State Government-special authorisation u/s. 30 (b) cannot be allowed by State Government it self. [Para 16]
(5) Order- duly passed on certain grounds-cannot be supplemented by fresh, reasons in the shape of affidavit. AIR 1978 SC 851 followed. [Para 18]
(6) Contract Act, 1872-S. 23-agreement of sharing profit in lottery is unlawful and void being against Lottery Act. [Para 19]
(7) Lottery (Niyantran Tatha Kar) Niyam, 1974 (M.P.)-R. 7-licence is granted personally to promoter-he cannot transfer working of licence. [Para 19]
(8) Lottery (Niyantran Tatba Kar) Adhiniyam, 1973 (M.P.)-Ss. 6 and 7 - period of licence-starts from date of grant-only one draw allowed-fur their draws are unlawful- Collector has no jurisdiction to condone unlawful act. [Para 22]
(9) Lottery (Niyantran Tatha Kar) Adbiniyam, 1973 (M.P.)-Ss.28, 10, 11 and 13-provisions of sections 11 and 13 not complied with-accounts and returns not furnished-illegal draws held-profits not spent in charitable purpose-25% of profits not deposited- no exemption from tax can be granted u/s. 28. [Para 27-a]
(10) Evidence Act, 1872-Ss. 113 and 162-Cabinet proceedings regarding private lottery-are not privilege documents-citizens have fundamental right to get such public interest information in democracy. AIR 1982 SC 149 followed. AIR 1988 SC 782 distinguished. [Para 28-b]
(11) Lottery (Niyantran Tatha Kar) Adhiniyam, 1973 (M.P.)-Ss. 8 & 30 (b)-special authorisation under S. 30 (b)-can only be granted to lotteries conducted by other State Governments u/s 8. [Paras 14-c & 38]
(12) Constitution of India-Art. 226-case can be disposed of without deciding question of vires-question of vires should not be decided. AIR 1988 SC 686 followed. [Para 38]
(13) Constitution of India-Art. 164-huge property acquired after joining Cabinet-no explanation given in proceedings-Chief Minister has to clear the cloud in public interest. AIR 1964 SC 72 and AIR 1964 SC 962 followed. [Para 41]
Per Suryawansbi, J.-
(14) Constitution of India-Arts. 226 and 227-public interest litigation-locus standi should be given a broad view-leader of opposition party not disentitled to invoke extraordinary jurisdiction AIR 1976 SC 242, AIR 1981 SC 344, AIR 1985 SC 1147 and AIR 1964 SC 72 followed. [Paras 5 to 8]
(15) Law-no person or official is above law. [Para 14]
(16) Lottery (Niyantran Tatba Kar) Adhiniyam, 1973 (M.P.)-Ss. 6 (3) and 14--punishment provided under-not adequate-penal provisions should be examined. [Para 15]
C.P. Sen, J.
1. This is a Public Interest Litigation regarding what is termed as Churhat Lottery Scandal. The Petitioner is seeking cancellation of the licence which was granted under M. P. Lottery (Niyantran Tatha Kar) Adhiniyam, 1973, (hereinafter referred to as Lottery Act) for holding the lottery, submission of accounts of the different draws of the lottery and the prizes distributed, quashing the order of the Collector condoning holding of lotteries beyond the licence period, quashing the order of the State Government granting exemption from payment of tax, for prosecution of the Society for committing various illegalities and irregularities in conducting the lottery against the provisions of the Lottery Act and M. P. Lottery (Niyantran Tatha Kar) Niyam, 1974, (hereinafter referred to as Lottery Rules) and the licence conditions, enquiry by an independent agency into the affairs of the Society and taking action against the Collector for granting licence without enquiry and without seeking full compliance of the provisions.
2. The Petitioner Shri Kailash Joshi is a leader of the Opposition in M. P. Vidhan Sabha. He has been Ex-President of the State Bhartiya Janta Party and was also Chief Minister of the State for sometime. Respondent No. 3 Shri Arjun Singh was elected as the Chief Minister of the State in June 1980, having been elected from Churhat Constituency in the Vidhan Sabha in the general elections and he continued his full term and thereafter he was again elected Chief Minister and in that capacity he continued up to 12-3-1985 when he was appointed as Governor of Punjab. He resigned from Vidhan Sabha seat. In his place, his son Shri Ajay Singh, Respondent No. 7, has been elected in the Vidhan Sabha from this constituency. The Respondent No. 3 then joined the Central Cabinet and thereafter became the Vice-President of the All India Congress Party. After sometime, he again became Cabinet Minister in the Ministry of Communication and returned to the State as Chief Minister on 14-2-1988. Shri Motilal Vora, the present Central Cabinet Minister for Health was the Chief Minister of the State between 13-8-1985 to 13-2-1988. It is not disputed that on the inspiration of the Respondent No. 3, Churhat Children Welfare Society (for brevity hereinafter referred to as Churhat Society) was registered under M. P. Registrikaran Adhiniyam, 1973, with the object of promoting education, rehabilitation and health to children, implementation and publicity of family welfare programmes and running of schools, libraries, training centres, welfare centres etc. with Shri Martand Singh ex-ruler of Rewa State and ruling party Member of Parliament as the Chairman, Dr. Sajjan Singh, brother of Respondent No. 3, as Vice Chairman, Shri Ajay Singh son of Respondent No. 3 as Secretary, Shri B.P. Singh, son-in-law of the Respondent No. 3, as Treasurer and Shri S. P. Singh, another relation of the Respondent No. 3 as member of the governing body.
3. Sometime in November 1983, the Churhat Society applied to the State Government for permission to run lottery for helping handicapped and destitute children of the area which was received by the State Government on 30-1 1-1983. The Finance Secretary wrote to the Churhat Society on 16-12-1983 that the Government has agreed to permit the Churhat Society to hold the lottery for the avowed purpose of the Society and since the Collector was the authority to grant licence, Churhat Society was advised to apply to the Collector for licence. The Collector was also advised by the Finance Secretary, on the same date, that on an application being made, the licence may be issued under Section 7 of the Lottery Act, subject to such terms and conditions as may be prescribed. Thereafter, Churhat Society applied to the Collector in Form-B prescribed under Section 6 of the Lottery Act for grant of licence to organise private lottery for raising funds for humaniterian purposes. On a regular basis, a licence was granted by t
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.