SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2013 Supreme(MP) 671

G.D.SAXENA
Vasant Kumar Jain – Appellant
Versus
Manakchand – Respondent


Advocates:
S.K. Shrivastava for appellant;
Sanjay Kumar Mishra for respondents.

JUDGMENT

1. This appeal under section 96 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 by the defendant-appellant has been filed against a judgment and decree dated 1st February, 2002 rendered in Civil Suit No.17-A/2000 by the Fourth Additional District Judge, Vidisha (M.P.) decreeing thereby the suit of the plaintiffs for declaration of title over the suit property (House No.34) situated in Ward No.5 of the Municipal Council, Vidisha by issuing permanent injunction against the defendant-appellant.

2. The facts in short just for the decision of this appeal are that Pannalal (deceased), the progenitor of the joint family died leaving behind his widow Smt. Rajkumari @ Rajjobai and their three sons, namely, Amarchand (late), Pooranchand (late) and Vasant Kumar (defendant-appellant herein) and also left two houses, first (suit house) is situated in Ward No.5 which was being used for family residence whereas another is situated in Ward No.6 which was a ruined condition and abandoned. The family properties, i.e., two houses mentioned above inherited from late Pannalal Jain were orally partitioned between the successors-members of the family. After family oral partition on the spot, one memorandum o

















































Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top