SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2014 Supreme(MP) 159

S.R.WAGHMARE
Pappu @ Pramod – Appellant
Versus
State of M. P. – Respondent


Advocates:
Hitesh Sharma for petitioner;
Pramod Meetha, Government Advocate for respondent/State.

ORDER

1. By this petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India, the petitioner Pappu @ Pramod Sahu has challenged the order dated 27.12.2013 (Annexure P-1) passed by Commissioner, Indore in Case No.53/Appeal/RSA/2013.

2. Briefly stated the prosecution case is that the impugned order of externment dated 20.11.2013 was passed by Commissioner, Indore and that initially on 8.6.2011, the District Magistrate Barwani had issued show cause notice dated 8.6.2011 to the petitioner under section 8(1) of the M.P. Rajya Suraksha Adhiniyam, 1990 and the petitioner had filed reply to the same. The petitioner has stated that although there were cases listed against him, he had not been convicted in any of the cases and his track record is clean and the cases recorded were of the year 1992 to 1994; despite filing reply on 9.11.2011 after a period of two years the District Magistrate passed the impugned order dated 20.11.2013 externing the present petitioner. Being aggrieved the petitioner had filed Writ Petition No.13582/2013 against the high handed action before the District Magistrate. The Court had directed that petitioner had alternative remedy on filing the appeal under sectio














Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top