SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2013 Supreme(MP) 749

SHANTANU KEMKAR, M.C.GARG
State of M. P. – Appellant
Versus
Virendra Shankar – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
For appellants :Ms. Mini Ravindran, Dy. Government Advocate
For respondents: Ramesh Chhazed

JUDGMENT :

M. C. Garg, J.:-

This writ appeal has been filed with application for condonation of delay in filing of the appeal which is barred by 1128 days. To support the original application, fresh application for condonation of delay has been filed as LA. No. 4886/12. It is on this application, arguments were heard.

2. In this application, the ground which has been taken to explain the delay are as follows :

(i) That on 28-2-2008, a letter has been sent by the Govt. Advocate, Indore to the SDO Neemuch informing the judgment passed in Writ Petition No. 9006/2003 on 13-2-2008 and thereafter in the matter an opinion of the Govt. Advocate, District Court Parisar, Neemuch dated 27-5-2009 was sent to the Collector, Neemuch stating the grounds for filing the writ appeal in the matter. Thereafter, the Collector District Neemuch had written a letter dated 8-6-2009 to the Secretary, Law and Legislative Affairs Department, Bhopal for getting permission to file writ appeal stating the grounds of appeal. Thereafter, the Sub Divisional Officer, Sub-Division Neemuch also wrote a letter dated 12






















































































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top