Back
SUJOY PAUL
Central Homeopathic & Biochemic Association – Appellant
Versus
State of M. P. – Respondent
JUDGMENT
This is second visit of the petitioners to this Court. Petitioner No. 1 is a registered society under the provisions of Madhya Pradesh Society Registrikaran Adhiniyam, 1973 (in short the Adhiniyam). The registration certificate of petitioner No. 1 is filed as Annexure P/2. It is stated that earlier election of the society took place on 31.7.2011 and the next elections are due on completion of three years from the said date as per the bye-laws. The petitioner No. 1 was served with a show-cause notice by respondent No. 2 dated 30.6.2012 (Annexure P/13). The petitioner No. 1 submitted its reply to the same but the said authority issued communication Annexure P/25 and stated that petitioner No. 1 did not file its reply. At this stage, petitioner No. 1 filed W.P. No. 6995/12 before this Court. This Court disposed of the said petition on 27.9.2012. On perusal of the material, it was found by this Court that petitioner No. 1's reply was very much received by the Assistant Registrar, and therefore, his finding that reply has not been received runs contrary to the record. On the basis of aforesaid, it was found that there is violation of principles of natural justice and the ma
The main legal point established in the judgment is the binding effect of the settlement between the parties, the waiver of the right to seek re-employment by the workmen, and the entitlement of the ....
A lockout is justified if it is declared in response to an illegal strike or a strike that is in breach of a settlement or award.
The combination of eyewitness testimonies, recovery of the weapon used, and forensic examination results can establish guilt in criminal cases, even based on circumstantial evidence.
The conviction of an accused person under Section 27(3) of the Arms Act is not permissible in law if the accused is also charged with committing murder under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code.
The court can enhance compensation based on the deceased's income and family dependency, and adjust the multiplier used by the Tribunal if found unjustified.
A valid signature must be in the candidate's own handwriting, as emphasized by the General Clauses Act and relevant case law.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
