Sujoy Paul, J.

1. Parties are on loggerheads on the question relating to validity of No-Confidence Motion proceedings. In this petition filed under Article 226/227 of the Constitution, the petitioner has prayed for setting aside the proceedings of the meeting dated 7.11.2012, whereby a No- Confidence Motion was passed against him. The order dated 30.1.2014, Annexure P-1, is also called in question, whereby the validity of the proceedings dated 7.11.2012 is upheld by the Commissioner, Chambal Division, Morena.

2. The necessary facts giving rise to this matter are that the petitioner was President of Janpad Panchayat Gohad, district Bhind. A notice was submitted by 21 members of Janpad Panchayat before the Collector on 17.10.2012 asking to convene the meeting for considering No-Confidence Motion. The Collector, in turn, on 30.10.2012 directed to convene a meeting on 7.11.2012 to decide the question of No- Confidence Motion. The meeting was convened on 7.11.2012 and No- Confidence Motion was passed. Thereafter, parties have fought a long drawn battle in the corridors of the Court. However, ultimately in WP No. 8532/2012, this Court on 16.11.2013 directed the petitioner to avai