S.R.WAGHMARE, PRAKASH SHRIVASTAVA
Ashoka Infraways Ltd. – Appellant
Versus
State of M. P. – Respondent
Smt. Waghmare, J. -- 1. By this arbitration appeal under section 37 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 the appellant Ashoka Infraways Limited is aggrieved by order dated 16.2.2015 passed by the Ist Additional District Judge, Dewas in Arbitration Case No.1/15 whereby the learned Judge dismissed the application under section 9 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 (hereinafter called “the Act” for brevity) filed by the appellants holding that the dispute was covered under the Madhya Pradesh Madhyastham Adhikaran Adhiniyam, 1983 Act and not under the Act of 1996.
2. Briefly stated the facts of the case are that the Ashoka Infraways Limited was a subsidiary of appellant No.2 Ashoka Buildcon Limited and the appellant No.1 was incorporated as “Special Purpose Vehicle” (SPV) for the purpose of implementing the Dewas Bypass Road Project. Thereby indicating that the appellant No.2 company was engaged inter alia in the business of construction and civil works. It has been submitted by the counsel for the appellants that it was one of the leading highway developers in the country and have executed various prestigious projects on the national as well as state level. That
The main legal point established in the judgment is the binding effect of the settlement between the parties, the waiver of the right to seek re-employment by the workmen, and the entitlement of the ....
A lockout is justified if it is declared in response to an illegal strike or a strike that is in breach of a settlement or award.
The combination of eyewitness testimonies, recovery of the weapon used, and forensic examination results can establish guilt in criminal cases, even based on circumstantial evidence.
The conviction of an accused person under Section 27(3) of the Arms Act is not permissible in law if the accused is also charged with committing murder under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code.
The court can enhance compensation based on the deceased's income and family dependency, and adjust the multiplier used by the Tribunal if found unjustified.
A valid signature must be in the candidate's own handwriting, as emphasized by the General Clauses Act and relevant case law.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.