SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2017 Supreme(MP) 273

VIVEK RUSIA
Oriental Insurance Co. Ltd. – Appellant
Versus
Asha Devi Potdar – Respondent


Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Appellant : S.V. Dandwate
For the Respondent: Sourabh Neema

ORDER :

Vivek Rusia, J.

Both the miscellaneous appeals are arising out of the award dated 23.8.2016, passed in the Claim Case No.37/2006, hence, both the appeals are being decided co-jointly.

2. Miscellaneous Appeal No.3432/2006 has been filed by the Oriental Insurance Company challenging the quantum of compensation awarded in favour of respondents No. 1 and 2 (claimants). The Miscellaneous Appeal No.3900/ 2006 has been filed by the claimants No.1 and 2 for enhancement of the compensation amount.

3. For disposal of these two appeals, the facts from Miscellaneous Appeal 3900/2006 are being taken which are as under:

4. On 22.9.2004, at about 2:15 p.m. near Yadav Dhaba Indore-Dhar Road, Gram Billor a Car bearing registration No.MP09/T-0363 had an accident with a Truck bearing registration No.MP09/K/5 863. The said car was owned by non-appellant No.4 and driven by late Gauri Shankar. Both the Car and Truck were insured by Oriental Insurance Company. In the said accident Mr. Anil Mittal, Mrs. Mridula Mittal, Ku. Amrita Mittal and Mr. Vishal Potdar received grievous injuries and immediate











































Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top