SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2016 Supreme(MP) 904

VIVEK RUSIA
Reena – Appellant
Versus
Maina Bai – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
For the Petitioner: Shri Sidharth Jain
For the Respondent: Shri D.S. Kale, Shri Yogesh Mittal

JUDGMENT :

Vivek Rusia, J.

With the consent of the parties, present petition is heard finally. The petitioner has filed this present petition being aggrieved by the order dated 06/05/2015, by which his application under section 151 of C.P.C seeking permission to cross-examine defendant no. 1 has been rejected.

2. That respondent nos. 1 to 3 being plaintiffs filed a suit for declaration, partition and possession of the suit property. In para 5 of the plaint, the plaintiff has stated that defendant no. 1 Ramaji has transferred the land being survey no. 166/2 area 4.807 hectors situated at Sindoda to defendant no. 5 Reena and further defendant no. 1 has mutated the land being survey no. 475 area 5.060 hectors in the name of Jayesh in the year 2009-10. Defendant no. 1 Ramji filed an affidavit by which, he has stated that plaintiff/defendant no. 2 and he himself are the real brothers and sisters. In para 4, he has stated that he is in exclusive possession of the suit land and the plaintiff and other defendants are not in possession and in cross-examination, he has denied the fact of mutation in favour of Reena, Jayesh and Nageshwar. In view of the above statement, defendant no. 5 (Smt. Ree

































Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top