VIVEK RUSIA
Reena – Appellant
Versus
Maina Bai – Respondent
Vivek Rusia, J.
With the consent of the parties, present petition is heard finally. The petitioner has filed this present petition being aggrieved by the order dated 06/05/2015, by which his application under section 151 of C.P.C seeking permission to cross-examine defendant no. 1 has been rejected.
2. That respondent nos. 1 to 3 being plaintiffs filed a suit for declaration, partition and possession of the suit property. In para 5 of the plaint, the plaintiff has stated that defendant no. 1 Ramaji has transferred the land being survey no. 166/2 area 4.807 hectors situated at Sindoda to defendant no. 5 Reena and further defendant no. 1 has mutated the land being survey no. 475 area 5.060 hectors in the name of Jayesh in the year 2009-10. Defendant no. 1 Ramji filed an affidavit by which, he has stated that plaintiff/defendant no. 2 and he himself are the real brothers and sisters. In para 4, he has stated that he is in exclusive possession of the suit land and the plaintiff and other defendants are not in possession and in cross-examination, he has denied the fact of mutation in favour of Reena, Jayesh and Nageshwar. In view of the above statement, defendant no. 5 (Smt. Ree
Ayaaubkhan Noorkhan Pathan v. State of Maharashtra
Biecco Lawrie v. State of West Bengal
Channabasappa Basappa Happali v. State of Mysore
K.L. Tripathi v. State Bank of India
Kesoram Cotton Mills Ltd. v. Gangadhar
Lakshman Exports Ltd. v. Collector of Central Excise
Meenglas Tea Estate v. Workmen
New India Assurance Company Ltd. v. Nusli Neville Wadia
State of M.P. v. Chintaman Sadashiva Vaishampayan
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.