R.S.JHA, A.K.JOSHI
Brijesh Yadav – Appellant
Versus
State Of M. P. – Respondent
R.S. Jha, J.
1. As all the aforesaid petitions raise a common issue for decision before this Court, they are heard and decided concomitantly.
2. The petitioners who are all MBBS Doctors working in the State of M.P. as Medical Officers, have filed these petitions challenging the constitutional validity of Regulations 9(iv) Proviso and 9(vii) of the Medical Council of India Post Graduate Medical Education Regulation, 2000 (hereinafter referred to as 'the Regulations of 2000') and Rules 2(vi), 2(vii), 5(ii) and 6(iii) of the M.P. Autonomous Medical and Dental Post Graduate Course (Degree/Diploma) Admission Rules 2017 (hereinafter referred to as 'the Rules of 2017') which are in the nature of Executive Instructions and govern admission to Post Graduate Degree and Diploma Medical Education courses in Government Colleges.
3. The petitioners are in-service Doctors who are posted in Government hospitals in the State of M.P. All of them assert that they have rendered more than 3 years of service in rural areas and have appeared in the 2017 National Eligibility cum Entrance Test (NEE
Dr. Dinesh Kumar v. Motilal Nehru Medical College
Dr. Snehelata Patnaik v. State of Orissa
Narayan Sharma (Dr) v. Dr. Pankaj Kr. Lekhar
Pre-PG Medical Sangharsh Committee v. Dr. Bajrang Soni
Satyabrata Sahoo v. State of Orissa
Snehlata Patnaik (Dr.) v. State of Orissa
State of Kerala v. T.P.Roshana
State of M.P. v. Gopal D. Tirthani
The main legal point established in the judgment is the binding effect of the settlement between the parties, the waiver of the right to seek re-employment by the workmen, and the entitlement of the ....
A lockout is justified if it is declared in response to an illegal strike or a strike that is in breach of a settlement or award.
The combination of eyewitness testimonies, recovery of the weapon used, and forensic examination results can establish guilt in criminal cases, even based on circumstantial evidence.
The conviction of an accused person under Section 27(3) of the Arms Act is not permissible in law if the accused is also charged with committing murder under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code.
The court can enhance compensation based on the deceased's income and family dependency, and adjust the multiplier used by the Tribunal if found unjustified.
A valid signature must be in the candidate's own handwriting, as emphasized by the General Clauses Act and relevant case law.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.