SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2018 Supreme(MP) 372

IN THE HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH
(DIVISION BENCH)
Hemant Gupta, CJ and Vijay Kumar Shukla, J.
Chief Municipal Officer v. Hindustan Copper Limited and others
Writ Petition No. 1249 of 2017 (Jabalpur); Decided on 10.5.2018.

Advocates:
Kishore Shrivastava with Kapil Jain and Ms. C.V. Rao for petitioner;
R.K. Sanghi for respondent No.1, Ms. Namrata Agrawal,
Government Advocate for respondent No.2/State.

Headnote:(1) Constitution of India -- Art.348(3) and 345 -- Madhya Pradesh Official Language Act, 1957 -- S.4 -- Terminal Tax (Assessment and Colelction) on the Goods Exported from Madhya Pradesh Municipal Limits Rules, 1996 (M.P.) -- R.7 -- conflict between Hindi and English texts of statute -- language of the State Hindi -- Act passed in Hindi, which is a Legislative action -- authoritative text in English -- is an anct of the Executive -- Legislative version would prevail.

       Held: We find that the language of the State being Hindi and the Act having been passed in Hindi, the English version of such text in Hindi is an act of the Executive, which will not prevail over the legislation enacted by the State Legislature in Hindi. Therefore, in case of conflict between Hindi version and the English version, the Legislative version would prevail rather than the authorized version published under the authority of the Hon'ble Governor as an Executive function. AIR 1961 SC 1534 followed. 1974 UP Tax Cases 570 (FB), AIR 1976 All. 420 (FB), 1997(2) MPLJ 487 and Civil Writ Petition No. 393/2002 (HP) relied on. (1996)3 SCC 576 and (2006)10 SCC 587 distinguished. AIR 1958 MP 16, 1983 JLJ 385=1983 RN 205 (FB), 2015(3) JLJ 326, AIR 1959 All. 208, AIR 1962 All. 240 (FB) and AIR 1974 All. 106(FB) discussed. AIR 1966 Raj. 142 referred to.

       (2) Interpretation of Statutes -- conflict in Hindi and English versions of staute -- Legislative enactment will prevail rather than Executive action of translation though published under authority of Governor. [Para 27

        ¼1½ Hkkjr dk lafo/kku && vuq- 348¼3½ rFkk 345 & e/; izns'k jktHkk"kk vfèkfu;e] 1957 && /kkjk 4 && e/; izns'k uxjikfyd lhek ls fu;kZr eky ij lhek&dj ¼fuèkkZj.k rFkk laxzg.k½ fu;e] 1996 ¼e-iz-½ && fu- 7 && dkuwu ds fganh vkSj vaxzsth ikBksa esa fojks/k && jkT; dh Hkk"kk fganh && vf/kfu;e fganh esa ikfjr] tks fo/kk;h ÑR; gS && vaxzsth esa izkf/kÑr ikB && dk;Zikfydk dk ÑR; gS && fo/kk;h ikB vfHkHkkoh gksxkA

       vfHkfu/kkZfjr % gekjk fu"d"kZ gS fd jkT; dh Hkk"kk fganh gksus ds dkj.k rFkk vf/kfu;e fganh esa ikfjr fd, tkus ds dkj.k] fganh ds ,sls ikB dk vaxzsth ikBkarj dk;Zikfydk dk ÑR; gS] tks jkT; fo/kku eaMy }kjk fganh esa vf/kfu;fer fo/kku ij vfHkHkkoh ugha gksxkA vr%] fganh ikB vkSj vaxzsth ikB esa fojks/k dh n'kk esa] dk;Zikfyd ÑR; ds :i esa ekuuh; jkT;iky ds izkf/kdkj ds v/khu izdkf'kr izkf/kÑr ikB ds ctk; fo/kk;h ikB vfHkHkkoh gksxkA , vkb vkj 1961 ,l lh 1534 vuqlfjrA 1974 ;wih VSDl dslsl 570 ¼iw.kZ U;k;ihB½] , vkb vkj 1976 byk- 420 ¼iw.kZ U;k;ihB½] 1997¼2½ ,e ih ,y ts 487 rFkk flfoy fjV fiVh'ku Ø-393@2002 ¼fg-iz-½ voyafcrA ¼1996½3 ,l lh lh 576 rFkk ¼2006½10 ,l lh lh 587 izHksfnrA , vkb vkj 1958 e-iz- 16] 1983 ts ,y ts 385 ¾1983 jkfu 205 ¼iw.kZ U;k;ihB½] 2015¼3½ ts ,y ts 326] , vkb vkj 1959 byk- 208] , vkb vkj 1962 byk- 240 ¼iw.kZ U;k;ihB½ rFkk , vkb vkj 1974 byk- 106 ¼iw.kZ U;k;ihB½ foosfprA , vkb vkj 1966 jkt- 142 fufnZ"VA

       ¼2½ fof/k dk fuoZpu && dkuwu ds fganh rFkk vaxzsth ikB esa fojks/k && vuqokn ds dk;Zifkyd ÑR; ds ctk;] Hkys gh og jkT;iky ds izkf/kdkj ds vèkhu izdkf'kr gks] fo/kk;h vf/kfufer vfHkHkkoh gksxhA ¼iSjk 27

ORDER

Gupta, C.J. -- 1. Challenge in the present writ petition is to an order dated 21.1.2017 (Annexure P-9) passed by the learned Civil Judge, Class-I, Baihar, District Balaghat in Municipal Appeal No. 01/2016 (Hindustan Copper Ltd. v. Chief Municipal Officer) whereby an application filed by the petitioner for reference to decide the question as to whether Hindi version or English version of The Terminal Tax (Assessment and Collection) on the Goods Exported from Madhya Pradesh Municipal Limits Rules, 1996, was ordered to be decided at the time of passing of the final order and if the Court finds contradictory position, then the matter would be referred to the High Court.

2. The Terminal Tax (Assessment and Collection) on the Goods Exported from Madhya Pradesh Municipal Limits Rules, 1996 (for short the ‘Rules’) were published on 7.3.1997. Such Rules have been framed in exercise of the powers conferred under section 355 read with sections 127 and 129 of the Madhya Pradesh Municipalities Act, 1961 (for short “the Act”). The relevant provisions of the Act read as under :

“127. Taxes to be imposed under this Act.(1) For the purpose of this Act, the Council shall, subject to any general or special order which the State Government may make in this behalf, impose in the whole or in any part of the Municipal Area, the following taxes namely :--

(a) a tax payable by the owners of buildings or lands situated within the city with reference to the gross annual letting value of the buildings or lands, called the property tax, subject to the provisions of sections 126, 127-A and 129.

(b) *a water tax, in respect of lands and building to which a water supply is furnished from or which are connected by means of pipe with municipal water works.

*(b) [Deleted by MP Act No.15 of 2010 on 19.4.2010]

(c) a general sanitary cess, for the construction and maintenance of public latrines and for removal and disposal of refuse and general cleanliness of the city.

(d) a general lighting tax, where the lighting of public streets and places is undertaken by the Council.

(e) a general fire tax, for the conduct and management of the fire service and for the protection of life and property in the case of fire.

(f) a local body tax on the entry of such goods as may be declared by the State Government by notification in the Official Gazette into the municipal area for consumption, use or sale therein at a rate not exceeding four percent of the value of goods :

Provided that no local body tax shall be levied on the goods --

(i) brought by a person into the municipal area for his personal use or consumption; or

(ii) brought by a registered dealer within the municipal area and transmitted within 15 days thereof-

(a) to a registered dealer in any other local body; or

(b) in the course of export out of the territory of India; or

(c) in the course of inter state trade outside the State.

(iii) specified in the Schedule to the Madhya Pradesh Sthaniya Kshetron Me Mal Ke Pravesh Par Kar Adhiniyam, 1976 (No. 52 of 1976).

*** *** ***

129. Imposition of Taxes and Fees.-

(1) The Council may, by a resolution, at the time to final adoption of the budget estimates for the next financial year, subject to the provisions of this Act and subject to such limitations and conditions, as may be prescribed by the State Government in this behalf-

(a) impose any of the taxes or fees specified in this Act; or

(b) increase the rates of taxes or fees already imposed.

(2) The resolution as referred to in sub-section (1) shall contain-

(a) in case of imposition of any tax or fee, the provisions under which such tax or fee is being imposed, class of persons or description of property to be taxed, the amount or rate of tax or fee being imposed, system of assessment and collection to be adopted and the date from which imposi



















































































































Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
Judicial Analysis

SupremeToday

SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top