SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2018 Supreme(MP) 409

VIVEK RUSIA
Manish Parashar – Appellant
Versus
Pratap – Respondent


Advocates:
Vinay Saraf with Anmol Bhatt for petitioner; Rohit Mangal, Government Advocate as amicus curiae for State.

ORDER

1. The plaintiff/petitioner has filed the present petition being aggrieved by the order dated 20.9.2017 by which the learned trial Court has directed to him to pay the ad valorem court fees on the amount of sale consideration mentioned in the sale deed dated 7.5.2016.

2. The plaintiff files the suit for the relief of declaration, permanent injunction. According to the petitioner, Plot No. 149 (New No. 165) of Gulmarg Bag Nagar, Ujjain (hereinafter referred as “suit land”) was purchased by his father Late Shivnarayan Parashar from Diamond Grah Nirman Sahkari Sanstha Maryadi, Ujjain by registered sale deed dated 24.4.1994. He had expired on 17.8.2010 and after his death the plaintiff, his sister Monika, Megha and mother Smt. Prakash have become joint owner of the said plot.

3. On 30.5.2016, for the first time, the plaintiff came to know that the defendants have got executed the sale deed dated 7.5.2016 of the said plot in their name. The so called sale deed got executed by impersonating his father who had already expired on 17.8.2010. Hence, the petitioner filed suit seeking relief of declaration that he is owner and in possession of the suit land as the sale deed was executed bet














Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top