SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2015 Supreme(MP) 1080

PRAKASH SHRIVASTAVA
Haji Mohd. Yusuf Ansari – Appellant
Versus
Salim – Respondent


Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Appellants : U. Gajankush
For the Respondent: V.R. Purohit

ORDER :

Prakash Shrivastava, J.

Heard finally with consent. This writ petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India is at the instance of defendants in the suit challenging the order of trial Court dated 17-4-2015 allowing the plaintiffs application under Order 22, Rules 4 and 9 of Civil Procedure Code as also the application under section 5 of Limitation Act and bringing the legal representatives of deceased defendant on record.

2. Having heard the learned counsel for parties and on perusal of the record, it is noticed that the original defendant had died on 2-4-2014 and respondent had filed application under Order 22, Rules 3 and 4 of Civil Procedure Code on 21-4-2014 (Annex. P-4) but in the said application no date of death and details of LRs were disclosed. The respondent, thereafter had filed the application dated 25-8-2014 under Order 22, Rules 2 , 3 , 4 and 9 of Civil Procedure Code disclosing the date of death as also the details of legal representatives of deceased defendant. The said application was filed with a delay of 36 days, therefore, an application for condonation of delay was also filed under section 5 of Limitation Act. The applications were duly supported







Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top