SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2015 Supreme(MP) 1010

S.C.SHARMA
Tanwar Singh – Appellant
Versus
State of M. P. – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
For the Appellant : Akash Rathi.
For the Respondents:C.S. Ujjainiya, Advocates.

ORDER :

S.C. SHARMA, J.

1. The petitioner before this Court has filed this present petition being aggrieved by the order dated 18-2-2015 passed by the Collector, Dewas in respect of Survey No. 836 area 10.926 hectare. By the aforesaid order, the Collector Dewas has recommended the matter to the Director Geology and Mining, Bhopal for cancellation of the lease, in exercise of powers conferred under the Madhya Pradesh Minor Mineral Rules, 1996 (hereinafter referred as 'the Rules of 1996'). The petitioner's contention is that a show cause notice was issued on 26-2-2014 directing the petitioner to show cause as to why the mining lease executed in his favour be (sic: not) cancelled or a fine be imposed upon him. The petitioner did submit a reply Anenxure-P-2 to the Collector (Mining) Dewas and thereafter the Collector (Mining) Dewas based upon the documents relating to the case has forwarded the matter by an order dated 18-2-2015 to the Director Geology and Mining, Bhopal.

2. The petitioner's contention is that certain grounds which were not reflected in the show cause notice have been made to be the basis by the Collector while recommending cancellation of the lease. It is also been argue



















































Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top