S.A.DHARMADHIKARI
ARVIND SINGH ALIAS PAPPU – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF M. P. – Respondent
S.A. Dharmadhikari, J.
With the consent of parties, matter is heard finally.
2. In this petition under Article 226 of Constitution of India, the petitioner has challenged the order dated 21/12/2010 passed against him for externment under the M.P. Rajya Suraksha Adhiniyam, 1990 (for brevity, 'Act of 1990') by the District Magistrate, Dist. Bhind and the appellate order dated 17/10/2011 passed by the Commissioner, Chambal Division, Morena rejecting the appeal of the petitioner filed against the order of externment.
3. The relevant facts briefly stated are that the Superintendent of Police, Dist. Bhind has submitted report dated 14/01/2010 to the District Magistrate, Bhind about criminal activities of the petitioner. In the report, the concerning police station had submitted details of chain of criminal offences alleged to have been committed by the petitioner from 1990 to 2009 and had made request that an externment order be passed against the petitioner in exercise of power under sections 3 & 4 of the Act of 1990. The District Magistrate, Dist. Bhind had issued a notice dated 21/06/2010 to show cause why a proceeding for order of externment from District Bhind as also the Distri
Pandharinath Shridhar Vs. Dy. Commissioner of Police, State of Maharashtra
The main legal point established in the judgment is the binding effect of the settlement between the parties, the waiver of the right to seek re-employment by the workmen, and the entitlement of the ....
A lockout is justified if it is declared in response to an illegal strike or a strike that is in breach of a settlement or award.
The combination of eyewitness testimonies, recovery of the weapon used, and forensic examination results can establish guilt in criminal cases, even based on circumstantial evidence.
The conviction of an accused person under Section 27(3) of the Arms Act is not permissible in law if the accused is also charged with committing murder under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code.
The court can enhance compensation based on the deceased's income and family dependency, and adjust the multiplier used by the Tribunal if found unjustified.
A valid signature must be in the candidate's own handwriting, as emphasized by the General Clauses Act and relevant case law.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.