Deepak @ Nanhu Kirar vs State Of M. P.

Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation

2020 Supreme(MP) 95

SUJOY PAUL, MOHD FAHIM ANWAR
Deepak @ Nanhu Kirar – Appellant
Versus
State Of M. P. – Respondent

Advocates Appeared:
Shreyas Pandit, Advocate, Som Mishra, Advocate

JUDGMENT

Sujoy Paul, J. - This appeal filed under section 374 of the Code of Criminal Procedure (Cr.P.C) is directed against the judgment passed in S.T.No.158/2018 dated 29.07.2019. The appeal was heard alongwith the Reference. The details of conviction and sentence are as under :-

Serial No.	Conviction under Section	Sentence	Fine imposed	Imprisonment in default of payment of Fine amount
01.	363 of IPC	R.I of Three years	Rs.200/-	Three months
02.	366 of IPC	R.I. of Five years	Rs.300/-	Six months
03.	201 of IPC	R.I. of Seven years	Rs.400/-	One year
04.	376AB of IPC	Life Imprisonment	Rs.500/-	Two years
05.	302 of IPC	Capital Punishment	Rs.500/-	Two years
06.	5(m) r/w Sec.6 of POCSO Act, 2012	No separate sentence is imposed as higher sentence under the IPC has

Click Here to Read the rest of this document

2020 Supreme(MP) 95

SUJOY PAUL, MOHD FAHIM ANWARDeepak @ Nanhu Kirar – AppellantVersusState Of M. P. – Respondent

Cases Referred (41)

SUJOY PAUL, MOHD FAHIM ANWAR
Deepak @ Nanhu Kirar – Appellant
Versus
State Of M. P. – Respondent