Back
PRAKASH SHRIVASTAVA, SHAILENDRA SHUKLA
Durgesh And Another – Appellant
Versus
State Of M. P. – Respondent
JUDGMENT
Shailendra Shukla, J. - This criminal appeal has been filed under Section 374(2) of Cr.P.C, preferred against the judgment dated 11.11.2010, passed by the ASJ, (Special Electricity Act, 2003), Indore, in S.T.No.333/2007, wherein the appellants Durgesh and Manish, have been convicted as under :-
2. The prosecution story in short was that on 20.5.2007 at around 11.00 PM to 11.45 PM while deceased Anil was talking to his brother Sachin (PW4) at Ambe Square, Indore, appellant Durgesh came with two other co-accused persons and started abusing Anil. When Anil protested, one of the accused caught hold of Anil and appellants Durgesh and Manish, inflicted knife injuries on Anil. When Anil shouted, witnesses Sonu (PW9), Rajkumar (PW18), Manoj (PW6) and Naresh (PW13) arrived at the spot. Injured Anil was taken to the M.Y. Hospital, Indore where he died and police was intimated by telephone operator of M.Y. Hospital. Merg was instituted on the basis of information received. Thereafter FIR was lodged in the MIG police station by Sachin against Durgesh and two unknown persons and after due investigation, a charge sheet was filed against Manish, Durgesh and Ritesh. The trial court framed
The main legal point established in the judgment is the binding effect of the settlement between the parties, the waiver of the right to seek re-employment by the workmen, and the entitlement of the ....
A lockout is justified if it is declared in response to an illegal strike or a strike that is in breach of a settlement or award.
The combination of eyewitness testimonies, recovery of the weapon used, and forensic examination results can establish guilt in criminal cases, even based on circumstantial evidence.
The conviction of an accused person under Section 27(3) of the Arms Act is not permissible in law if the accused is also charged with committing murder under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code.
The court can enhance compensation based on the deceased's income and family dependency, and adjust the multiplier used by the Tribunal if found unjustified.
A valid signature must be in the candidate's own handwriting, as emphasized by the General Clauses Act and relevant case law.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
