Back
S. C. SHARMA, SHAILENDRA SHUKLA
State Of M. P. : Honey @ Kakku – Appellant
Versus
Honey @ Kakku : State Of M. P. – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. conviction details of appellant (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. appellant's plea and arguments against conviction (Para 3 , 4) |
| 3. questions for consideration in appeal (Para 5 , 6) |
| 4. evidence regarding age of deceased (Para 7 , 8 , 9 , 10) |
| 5. appellant's involvement in the crime (Para 11 , 12) |
| 6. identification of the deceased (Para 18 , 20) |
| 7. recovery of incriminating evidence (Para 22 , 28 , 30) |
| 8. dna evidence linking appellant to crime (Para 38 , 46 , 48) |
| 9. application of legal precedents in sentencing (Para 50 , 52 , 54 , 56) |
| 10. final sentencing considerations and judgement summary (Para 64 , 79 , 80 , 81) |
JUDGMENT
Shailendra Shukla, J. - The present reference and appeal arise out of judgment dated 30.9.2019, pronounced in Special Case No. 2147/2018 by the 15th A.S.J. and Special Judge, Indore whereby, appellant Honey @ Kakku has been convicted for the offence punishable under Sections 363 , 366, 376AB, 302, 201, 376A of IPC and under Section 5 (n) read with Section 6 of POCSO Act. The accused has not been sentenced separately under Section 5 (n) read with Section 6 of POCSO Act, in view of Section 42 of POCSO Act which provides for sentencing under the provisions of IPC, if such
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
