SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2020 Supreme(MP) 415

(DIVISION BENCH)
Sheel Nagu and Rajeev Kumar Shrivastava,JJ.
State of M. P. v. Ravi @ Toli Malviya
Criminal Reference Case No. 13 of 2019 and Criminal Appeal No. 9132 of 2019(Gwalior); against the judgment dated 26/30.9.2019 passed by the II Additional Sessions Judge & Special Judge (POCSO Act), Vidisha in Special Sessions Trial No. 300002/2016; Decided on30.1.2020

Advocates:
Kuber Boddh, Dy.A.G. for applicant/State in CRRFC No. 13/2019 and for respondent/State in CRA No. 9132/2019; Vijay Dutt Sharma, Amicus Curiae for respondent in CRRFC No. 13/2019;
Padam Singh for appellant in CRA No. 9132/2019.

Headnote:

(1) Criminal P. C., 1973 -- Ss. 273 and 317 -- evidence to be taken in presence of accused -- S. 317 provides recording of evidence in absence of accused if he isrepresented by pleader -- condition precedent -- reason for doing so should be recorded. 2019 CrLR (SC) 633 and 1996 CrLJ 46 referred to. [Para 14

(2) Criminal P. C., 1973 -- Ss. 273, 299 and 317-- prosecution witness examined in absence of accused -- no specific reasoned order under which evidence could have been recorded -- pleader of accused had not given any statement that he was authorised by accused to cross-examine witness in absence of accused -- S.273 opens with "Except as otherwise expressly provided…" -- only exception is if accused remained absent for circumstances mentioned in Ss. 299 and 317 -- trial Court erred in proceeding with witness, overlooking mandatory provision of S.273 -- matter remanded to cause examination, cross-examination and re-examination of prosecution witness in presence of accused and his pleader -- after completion of trial, trial Court shall pronounce judgment afresh. 2019 CrLR (SC) 633 followed. 1996 CrLJ 46 and Cr. A. No. 345 of 88 decided on 5.5.1988 relied on. [Paras 18 to 20

¼1½ naM izfØ;k lafgrk] 1973 && /kkjk 273 rFkk 317 && lk{; dk vfHk;qDr dh mifLFkfr esa fy;k tkuk && vfHk;qDr dk izfrfuf/kRo IyhMj }kjk fd;k tk jgk gks rc /kkjk 317 esa vfHk;qDr dh vuqifLFkfr esa lk{; dk vfHkys[ku micaf/kr && iwoZ 'krZ && ,slk djus ds fy, dkj.k vfHkfyf[kr fd;k tkuk pkfg,A 2019 lhvkj ,y vkj ¼,l lh½ 633 rFkk 1996 lhvkj ,y ts 46 fufnZ"VA ¼iSjk 14

¼2½ naM izfØ;k lafgrk] 1973 && /kkjk 273] 299 rFkk 317 && vfHk;kstu lk{kh vfHk;qDr dh vuqifLFkfr esa ijhf{kr && ,slk dksbZ fofufnZ"V ldkj.k vkns'k ugha ftlds v/khu lk{; vfHkfyf[kr fd;k tk ldrk Fkk && vfHk;qDr ds IyhMj us ,slk dksbZ dFku ugha fn;k fd vfHk;qDr dh vuqifLFkfr esa lk{kh dh izfrijh{kk djus ds fy, mls vfHk;qDr }kjk izkf/kÑr fd;k x;k && /kkjk 273 dk vkjaHk ßvfHkO;Dr :i ls tSlk micaf/kr gS mlds flok;&&&&Þ ls gksrk gS && ,dek= viokn rc gS tc vfHk;qDr /kkjk 299 rFkk 317 esa mfYyf[kr ifjfLFkfr;ksa ds dkj.k vuqifLFkr jgs && fopkj.k U;k;ky; us /kkjk 273 dk vkKkid mica/k vuns[kk djrs gq, lk{kh ds laca/k esa dk;Zokgh dj xyrh dh && vfHk;qDr rFkk mlds IyhMj dh mifLFkfr esa vfHk;kstu lk{kh dh ijh{kk] izfrijh{kk rFkk iqu% ijh{kk fd, tkus ds fy, ekeyk izfrizsf"kr && fopkj.k iw.kZ gksus ds i'pkr~ fopkj.k U;k;k;y u, fljs ls fu.kZ; ikfjr djsA 2019 lhvkj ,y vkj ¼,l lh½ 633 vuqlfjrA 1996 lh vkj ,y ts 46 rFkk nkafMd vihy Ø- 345 lu~ 88 fu.khZr fnukad 5-5-1988 voyafcrA ¼iSjk 18 ls 20

JUDGMENT

Shrivastava, J. -- 1. This judgment shall govern the disposal of Criminal Reference Case No. 13/2019 as well as Criminal Appeal No. 9132/2019 as both arise out of judgment dated 26/30.9.2019 passed by Second Additional Sessions Judge & Special Judge (Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act, 2012), Vidisha (MP) in Special Sessions Trial No. 300002/2016.

2. As per Criminal Reference Case No. 13/2019, Second Additional Sessions Judge & Special Judge (Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act, 2012), Vidisha (MP) vide judgment dated 26/30.9.2019 in Special Sessions Trial No. 300002/2016, having found the accused guilty under sections 363, 366-A, 364, 376(2)(i), 376(2)(j), 376(2)(k), 302 and 201 IPC, has inflicted penalty of death sentence and has submitted the matter for confirmation.

3. Criminal Appeal No. 9132/2019 has been filed by the accused from jail against the aforesaid judgment, whereby he has been convicted and sentenced as under :-

Sections

Act

Imprisonment

Fine

Imprisonment in lieu of fine

363

IPC

Seven years RI

1000/-

one month additional RI

366-A

IPC

Ten years RI

2000/-

two months additional RI

364

IPC

Ten years RI

2000/-

two months additional RI

376(2)(i)

IPC

Life Imprisonment

4000/-

three months additional RI

376(2)(j)

IPC

Life Imprisonment

4000/-

three months additional RI

376(2)(k)

IPC

Life Imprisonment

4000/-

three months additional RI

302

IPC

Penalty of Death Sentence

    -

 

201

IPC

Seven years RI

1000/-

one month additional RI

It was also directed in the judgment that all the punishments of imprisonment shall run concurrently.

4. The short facts of the case are that on 24.10.2015 in between 2 pm to 7 pm the accused had kidnapped 7 years old prosecutrix from the temple situated outside platform No. 6 from the custody of her lawful guardians, thereafter accused committed rape with the minor and killed her and knowingly disappeared the evidence of offence committed by him. According to the prosecution, on 25.10.2015 informant Rajkumar (PW1) and Gajendra Sahu (PW2) had seen deadbody in the well of Mallu Patel. They informed the Police Station Civil Line, Vidisha. ASI S.N.S. Solanki (PW34) reached the spot and registered merg intimation (Ex.P/1). On the basis of merg intimation, Police Station Civil Line, Vidisha registered Merg Case No. 80/2015 (Ex.P-38). S.N.S. Solanki (PW34) prepared the spot map (Ex.P-5). Thereafter, body of the deceased was taken out from the well and Safina Form (Ex.P-50) was issued. Thereafter post-mortem of the deadbody was conducted. The post-mortem report Ex.P-29 and Ex.P-51 reveals as under :-

“A necked dead body female child lying in supine position on pm table. Rigor mortis present over lower limb. Mouth semi open, eye closed. Conjunctival congestion present and swelling present over face and eye. Cynosis present over the lip and tip of nose. Tongue between the teeth and impression of upper teeth on anterior aspect of tongue and red colour secretion over both nostril region. Ecchymosis present on vertebral aspect of tongue and hypostasis present over the back. Both wrists were open and mud present over the body, more on right hand and peeling of skin over thigh (inner and medial aspect of thigh) and following injuries were present over the body :

(i) Contusion 4cm x 4cm over right frontal region over headm ecchymosis present;

(ii) Contusion 4cm x 4cm over left just above eyebrow;

(iii) Contused abbrasion 3cm x 2cm over right side of neck below the angle of mandible;

(iv) Multiple abbrasions present ove anterior and superior aspect of wound No.(iii), size varies 1cm x ¼ cm and . 5cm x 1/4cm.

(v) Multiple abbrasions (four) 1 and 1/4cm over right TM Joint (in front of right ear) and .5cm x 1/4cm.

All injuries are anti-mortem in nature.”

As per opinion of the doctor, ca

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top