Back
SUJOY PAUL, SHAILENDRA SHUKLA
Irshad Hussian Qurashi – Appellant
Versus
State of M. P. – Respondent
ORDER :
Shailendra Shukla, J.
1. Submissions were made on I.A. No. 1766/2021, which is an application for amendment in prayer clause.
2. As per the application, the date of the impugned order was wrongly mentioned as 27.8.2018 whereas, it was 4.2.2021.
3. The application for amendment stands allowed in view of the fact that the date mentioned earlier in prayer clause was written erroneously.
4. Let the amendment be carried out during the course of the day.
5. Accordingly, I.A. No. 1766/2021 stands allowed and disposed of.
6. Final submissions were heard. The same is being disposed of as under:-
2. The facts of the case precisely s
The main legal point established in the judgment is the importance of timely and effective preventive action in externment proceedings, as well as the conditions that must be satisfied for an order o....
The main legal point established in the judgment is the requirement for timely and effective preventive action under Section 5(a)(b) of the M.P. Rajya Suraksha Adhiniyam, and the strict conditions th....
The central legal point established in the judgment is that for passing an order of externment under Madhya Pradesh Surksha Adhiniyam, 1990, both conditions mentioned under section 5(b)(i) and (ii) o....
The legal principle established is that for an externment order to be valid, the person's engagement in criminal activities must have close proximity to the date of the order, and witnesses must be u....
The main legal point established in the judgment is that externment orders must satisfy the requirements of close proximity to the offense, objective consideration, and satisfaction of the District M....
The main legal point established in the judgment is the requirement for a fresh externment order to consider an entirely different set of cases that did not constitute a part of the earlier proceedin....
Old and stale cases cannot be considered for externment, and there must be a live link between the activities and the necessity of externment. Specific findings and the recording of reasons are essen....
The court ruled that externment orders require substantial evidence and must not infringe on fundamental rights without clear justification.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
