SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2021 Supreme(MP) 257

VIVEK RUSIA
Bakshiram – Appellant
Versus
Ghisibai – Respondent


Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Appellant :Sunil Kumar Jain, Learned Senior Advocate and Nipun Choudhary, Learned Counsel.

JUDGMENT :

Vivek Rusia, J.

Heard on the question of admission with records of courts below.

1. The appellant/plaintiff (Since deceased now represented by their legal heirs and hereinafter referred as "plaintiff") has filed the present appeal being aggrieved by the judgment and decree dated 29.11.2014 passed by 21st Civil Judge, Class-I Indore and judgment dated 06.08.2019 passed by 25th Additional District Judge, Indore whereby the suit and first appeal have been partly allowed.

2. Facts of the case in short as under:

As per averment, in the plaint, the plaintiff is a son of late Sidhnath from his first wife late Parwati Bai. After the death of Parwati Bai, Sidhnath kept Ghisibai as a wife who gave birth to the defendants namely Mansharam, Mishrilal and Permanand. The Sidhnath died in the year 1999 and left 37.05 bigha land. The details of the survey numbers total in 14 located in Gram Buranikhedi, Tehsil and District Indore are mentioned in Schedule-A of the plaint. In the year 1960 the plaintiff at the age of 20 years got an employment in the Forest Department and from his savin

    Click Here to Read the rest of this document
    1
    2
    3
    4
    5
    6
    7
    8
    9
    10
    11
    SupremeToday Portrait Ad
    supreme today icon
    logo-black

    An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

    Please visit our Training & Support
    Center or Contact Us for assistance

    qr

    Scan Me!

    India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

    For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

    whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
    whatsapp-icon Back to top