JUDGMENT :

Sanjay Dwivedi, J.

Since learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned counsel for the contesting respondent Nos. 2 and 3 are ready to argue the case finally, it is accordingly heard finally.

1. This petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India has been filed by the petitioner questioning the legality and validity of the order dated 08.05.2020 (Annexure P/1) whereby the Sub Divisional Officer-cum-Registrar, Public Trust, Khandwa has done nothing, but, issued certain direction to the petitioner-trust on an application filed by the respondent Nos. 2 and 3 under Sections 26 and 27 of the Madhya Pradesh Public Trusts Act, 1951. The petitioner has also assailed the order dated 08.01.2021 whereby the Registrar, Public Trust, exceeding its jurisdiction has entirely reviewed its own order dated 08.05.2020.

2. The facts of the case in nutshell are that the petitioner is a public trust duly registered under the Madhya Pradesh Public Trusts Act, 1951 (for short 'the Act of 1951'). The respondent Nos. 2 and 3 filed an application under Section 26 and 27 of the Act of 1951 before the Registrar, Public Trust stating that they are the journalists and social workers and w