SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2020 Supreme(MP) 1124

VISHAL DHAGAT
Rajendra Singh Pawar – Appellant
Versus
State of M. P. – Respondent


Advocates:
Munish Saini for Petitioners; Aman Pandey, Panel Lawyer for respondents/State.

ORDER

1. Petitioners have filed this present writ petition making following prayers:-

7.1 To call for entire record from the office of respondent Nos. 2 and 3 relating to steps taken and investigation conducted in relation to the written complaint submitted by the petitioners (Annexure P/6)

7.2. To direct respondents No. 2 and 3 to take appropriate action on the written complaint submitted by the petitioners (Annexure P/6) and register FIR against accused Shridhar Ingle S/o Shri D. S. Ingle R/o C-26, New Jail Road, Indore Byepass, Bhopal (M.P.) while keeping in view his previous conduct as was appreciated by this Hon’ble Court in MCrC No. 11099/2016 (Annexure P/15).

2. Counsel for the petitioners submitted that no action has been taken by respondent No.3 on his complaint/information given regarding commission of offence by one Shridhar Engle. It is submitted by counsel for the petitioners that Shridhar Engle is a habitual offender and he is doing forgery and cheating and, therefore, offences ought to have been registered by respondent No.3 against him.

3. Number of petitions are filed before High Court as Police does not take any decision on a complaint made by a party regarding e

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top