ORDER

1. This petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India has been filed seeking the following relief :--

“(i) That, respondents may kindly be directed to consider the case of petitioner for giving the benefit of service as has been given to the private respondent No. 4 & 5.

(ii) That, respondents may also be directed to extend the all service benefit from the date on which benefit has been given to the juniors.

(iii) That, any other relief which this Hon'ble High Court may deem fit, with cost of the petition.”

2. It is submitted by the counsel for the petitioner that by order dated 1.12.1990, the petitioner was appointed as a Cook on daily wager for a period of 89 days, whereas respondent No. 5 was appointed as daily wager on 27.7.1994 and respondent No. 4 was appointed on 10.03.1992 on the post of Peon/Cook/Waterman. It is submitted that the respondents by adopting the method of pick and choose put the respondent No. 5 in regular service thereby paying him all benefits from 1.4.1997 and since the petitioner is a lady and was not aware of the fact that the respondent No. 5 has been considered, did not raise any objection. However, the respondent No. 4 filed a writ