JUDGMENT

1. This petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India has been filed seeking following relief:-

(i) That, the impugned order dated 25.06.2014 kindly be set aside.

(ii) That, the respondent be directed issue appointment to the petitioner for Samvida Shala Shiksha Verg-II.

Any other relief which this Hon'ble Court deems fit in the fact and circumstances of the case same may kindly be granted to the petitioner.

2. By this writ petition, the petitioner has challenged the order dated 25.06.2014 to claim that the petitioner was entitled for appointment on the post of Samvida Shala Shikshak Class - II, but she has been denied her legitimate claim. It is further submitted that the petitioner has made successive representations.

3. Heard the learned counsel for the parties.

4. The petitioner has approached after eight long years. It is well established principle of law that successive representations would not give rise to a fresh cause of action. Even according to the petitioner, last representation was made in the year 2017. Much water must have flown under the bridge. The delay and laces defeats equity. The Supreme Court in the case of Union of India and others Vs. C. Girija