SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2021 Supreme(MP) 569

SUJOY PAUL, PRANAY VERMA
Arun Kumar Dey – Appellant
Versus
State of M. P. Through Special Police Establishment – Respondent


Advocates:
Arvind Gokhale for applicant; Vaibhav Jain for respondent.

ORDER

Paul, J. -- 1. This petition filed under section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (Cr.P.C.) takes exception to the order dated 24.8.2021 passed by the Special Judge (PC Act), Ujjain in Special Case No.4/2018 whereby the application preferred by the petitioner under section 311 of the Cr.P.C. is rejected by the Court below.

2. In nutshell, the case of the is that he is facing prosecution under sections 7, 13(1) and 13(2) of the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 (PC Act). The case of the prosecution is that petitioner has received an illegal gratification for executing lease deed in favour of the complainant. The petitioner at the relevant time was working as Manager of District Industries Centre at Ujjain where he was contacted by the complainant for execution of lease deed in his favour. During this process, the petitioner allegedly demanded an illegal gratification which resulted into a trap in which petitioner's hands, pocket and pant were washed in sodium earbonate solution which turned pink. Bottles in which washings were kept, were sent to the Forensic Science Laboratory, Rau, District – Indore for analysis.

3. In turn, Scientific Officer submitted the report w

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top