SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(All) 2718

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ALLAHABAD
Hon'ble Manju Rani Chauhan,J.
Premanshu – Appellant
Versus
State of U.P. – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
For the Applicant : P.K. Singh.
For the Opposite Party : G.A.

JUDGMENT :

Manju Rani Chauhan, J.

1. Heard Mr. Rajeev Singh, Advocate holding brief of Mr. P.K. Singh, learned counsel for the applicant as well as Mr. Rizwan Ahmad, learned A.G.A. for the State and perused the record.

2. The present application has been filed assailing the order dated 16.06.2023 vide which the application under Section 311 Cr.P.C. as moved by the applicant for examination of P.W.-3 has been rejected.

3. Learned counsel for the applicant submits that the impugned order has been passed without application of judicial mind. During examination of P.W.-3 certain relevant questions which were important for proper adjudication of the matter could not be asked by the lawyer of the applicant, therefore, it would have been appropriate for the Court to allow the application permitting examination of P.W.-3. The order impugned has been passed in an illegal and arbitrary manner, therefore, the same may be set-aside.

4. Learned A.G.A for the State on the other hand submits that there is no illegality in the order dated 16.06.2023 as after detailed discussion and application of judicial mind, the order impugned has been passed. He further submits that the present application requesti

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top