S.A.DHARMADHIKARI
Dhirendera Sikarwar – Appellant
Versus
State of M. P. – Respondent
ORDER
1. Heard on the question of admission as well as interim relief.
2. By this petition, under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, challenge has been made to order dated 31.8.2021 (Annexure P/1), whereby petitioner, a Patwari, has been transferred from Tehsil Mehgaon to Tehsil Lahar, District Bhind (M.P.) on the ground of administrative exigency.
3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits the impugned transfer order is in blatant violation of the transfer policy. It is submitted that earlier vide order dated 5.7.2019, the petitioner has been transferred from Gram Varah, Tehsil Lahar to Tehsil Mehgaon and in compliance of the said transfer order, the petitioner has joined at Mehgaon, but thereafter vide impugned transfer order within a period of two years, the petitioner has again been transferred from Tehsil Mehgaon Tehsil Lahar, District Bhind (M.P.) on the ground of administrative exigency, though no such administrative exigency exists, which indicates frequent transfer of the petitioner since as per transfer policy itself an employee has to be kept in a particular place at least for a period of three years. The father of the petitioner is aged about 83 years and has bee
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.