SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2021 Supreme(MP) 580

S.A.DHARMADHIKARI
Dhirendera Sikarwar – Appellant
Versus
State of M. P. – Respondent


Advocates:
Nakul Khedkar for petitioner; G.K. Agrawal, Government Advocate for respondents/State.

ORDER

1. Heard on the question of admission as well as interim relief.

2. By this petition, under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, challenge has been made to order dated 31.8.2021 (Annexure P/1), whereby petitioner, a Patwari, has been transferred from Tehsil Mehgaon to Tehsil Lahar, District Bhind (M.P.) on the ground of administrative exigency.

3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits the impugned transfer order is in blatant violation of the transfer policy. It is submitted that earlier vide order dated 5.7.2019, the petitioner has been transferred from Gram Varah, Tehsil Lahar to Tehsil Mehgaon and in compliance of the said transfer order, the petitioner has joined at Mehgaon, but thereafter vide impugned transfer order within a period of two years, the petitioner has again been transferred from Tehsil Mehgaon Tehsil Lahar, District Bhind (M.P.) on the ground of administrative exigency, though no such administrative exigency exists, which indicates frequent transfer of the petitioner since as per transfer policy itself an employee has to be kept in a particular place at least for a period of three years. The father of the petitioner is aged about 83 years and has bee

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top