VISHAL MISHRA
Uday Singh Thakur – Appellant
Versus
State of Madhya Pradesh – Respondent
JUDGMENT
1. The present petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India has been filed challenging the validity, legality and propriety of the order dated 05.10.2022 (Annexure P/1) passed by the respondent No.5, whereby the petitioner has been transferred from Gram Panchayat Dhhimroli, Janpad Panchayat Beena, District Sagar to Gram Panchayat Sesaisaji, Janpad Panchayat Banda, District Sagar.
2. The only ground taken by the petitioner is that he was transferred vide order dated 22.12.2021 from Gram Panchayt Besrakasoi, Nawgaon to Gram Panchayat Dhimroli. His name finds at serial no.21 in the aforesaid list and within a period of 9 months he has again been transferred vide impugned order from Gram Panchayat Dhhimroli to Gram Panchayat Sesaisaji, Janpad Panchayt Banda. It is stated that it is a frequent transfer of the petitioner without assigning any reason. It is submitted that a representation (Annexure P/3) has been filed showing personable inconvenience which is pending consideration. An innocuous prayer is made to direct the respondents/authorities to consider and decide the pending representation expeditiously.
3. Per contra, counsel appearing for the State has opposed the
Bank of India vs. Jagjit Singh Mehta
Mridul Kumar Sharma Vs. State of M.P. and others reported in ILR (2015) MP 255
National Hydroelectric Power Corporation Ltd. vs. Shri Bhagawan reported in (2001) 8 SCC 574
Shilpi Bose vs. State of Bihar reported in 1991 Supp2 SCC 659
State of U.P. vs. Gobardhan Lal
Union of India and Ors v. S.L. Abbas reported in AIR 1993 SC 2444
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.