Judicial review of transfer orders is limited; transfers are inherent to service unless proven otherwise.

ORDER :

Sameer Jain, J.

1. The instant petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, whereby a challenge is raised against the impugned transfer order dated 22.02.2024, by way of which, the petitioner has been transferred from the Office of A.En. (132 KV GSS), Gopal Mill, Kota to the Office of A.En. (132 KV GSS) Lakheri, Bundi.

2. Being aggrieved of the order impugned dated 22.02.2024, the petitioner has challenged the same on the following grounds, namely:-

2.1. That within a short span of time, the petitioner has been subjected to multiple transfers, thereby causing undue hardship in his familial life.

2.2. That the transfer order dated 22.02.2024 has been passed with malice and the petitioner has been transferred from Kota to Bundi, merely in order to accommodate private respondent no.4-Sh. Yogendra Singh Hada.

2.3. That the petitioner’s wife is seeking treatment for certain gynecological diseases in Kota. Moreover, the petitioner’s two kids are also studying in Kota. Therefore, displacing the family would cause undue hardship to the petitioner.

2.4. That the petitioner is a low-paid employee.

3. Per contra, learned counsel for the respondent-employer has vehemently opposed the instant petition and submitted that the scope of judicial interference is minimal in transfer orders, especially when the same are passed on account of administrative exigencies.

4. Heard learned counsel for both the sides and scanned through the record of the petition.

5. At the outset, it is noted that the Hon’ble Apex Court, through a plethora of judgments, has time and again held that the permissibility and scope of judicial review against transfer orders is miniscule. The rationale exercised to circumscribe the Courts interference with transfer orders whilst exercising writ jurisdiction, primarily pertains to the fact that a bedlam of an aggravated magnitude shall ensue within the workings of the Government, if all employees, posted at a location of their liking, refuse to and/or contest their postings, when issued on account of administrative exigencies. Inevitably, the only scope of interference subsists in an eventuality where the transfer orders are issued on account of certain malafides, at the end of the transferring authority.

6. In Varadha Rao vs. State of Karnataka and Ors. reported in (1986) 4 SCC 131, the Hon’ble Apex Court held as under:-

“We agree with the view expressed by the learned Judges that transfer is always understood and construed as an incident of service. The words 'or other conditions of service' in juxtaposition to the preceding words 'denies or varies to his disadvantage his pay, allowances, pension' in Rule 19(1)(a) must be construed ejusdem generis. Any alteration in the conditions of service must result in prejudice to the Government servant and some disadvantage touching his pay, allowances, pension, seniority, promotion, leave etc. It is well understood that transfer of a Government servant who is appointed to a particular cadre of transferable posts from one place to another is an ordinary incident of service and therefore does not result in any alteration of any of the conditions of service to his disadvantage. That a Government servant is liable to be transferred to a similar post in the same cadre is a normal feature and incident of Government service and no Government servant can claim to remain in a particular place or in a particular post unless, of course, his appointment itself is to a specified, non-transferable post.”

7. The Hon’ble Apex Court in Rajendra Roy vs. Union of India and Anr. reported in (1993) 1 SCC 148, has held that the order of transfer is a natural consequence of service, especially when the transferred employee is rendering his services on a transferable post. The relevant extract is reproduced herein-under:-

“It is true that the order of transfer often causes a lot of difficulties and dislocation in the family set up of the concerned employees but on that score the order of tran